70kgman

In. Active.

In. Active.

In. Active. I know. cutting it a little close with my timing on this one. Forgot about it.

[h=1]10-17 $1000 cash round #11[/h] Your response has been recorded.

[h=1]10-14 Betmania Cash[/h] Your response has been recorded.

I hope the tie breaker isn't time of entry. That would be a pretty lame way to decide things.

In / active

In. Active.

Bengals for me this week.

[h=1]10-11 #6 HR NCAA VEGAS[/h] Your response has been recorded.

[h=1]10-10 $100 cash round #10[/h] Your response has been recorded.

In. Active.

I probably should of worded the title more neutral. But in my defense, I never wanted to make a thread about it at all. I tried to get it taken care of privately via live chat and a PM on the forum first. Was lied to and quickly gotten rid of on live chat with a resolution of basically "We're right, you're wrong", and never got a reply to the pm (I saw the green light next to their name on here saying they were online several times while I was waiting). At that point I was starting to feel cheated and ignored.

In. Active.

In. Active.

[h=1]10-5 BM last man standing[/h] Your response has been recorded.

Thanks.

Honestly, I still would of brought it up in that hypothetical scenario. If I didn't I would just be setting myself for this to happen again, and would have zero leverage in that scenario. The live chat rep claiming CLB was supposed to be -185 at 12:35 and CHI were supposed to be -200 at 1:08 was the biggest red flag to me that is was intentional "damage control" after the 70-80 cent opener to closer line move on both and not an innocent software mistake or whatever. Those statements are not believable at all when compared to line history for those games at other books. I don't think that is a fair comparison, as the main issue is they absolutely were not bad lines at those times and should not have been cancelled in the first place. If they were legit bad lines that I even accidentally bet into, that would be understandable and partly my fault, and I wouldn't even bring it up or try to get them reversed.

In. Active.

[h=1]10-4 #4 HR las vegas NCAA[/h] Your response has been recorded.

Thanks.

[h=1]10-3 #9 $1000 cash[/h] Your response has been recorded.

Not sure. I don't think my next login was until the next day, that is when I found the note saying they voided those two wagers. And like I mentioned, they deleted the wagers from my history, so there is no time stamp stating what time they were cancelled.

Or this will happen. Be careful. I PM'd HRW on the forum to try to settle it privately, but never got a reply. So, here is the story... In short. Played Columbus (-140) and Chicago (-155) for preseason NHL on October 1st. Beat the closing line significantly on both. Login the next day to find both of them voided claiming they were bad lines. They were not bad lines. I was not "taking shots" at bad or slow moving lines. Every book had the same price at that time, and both lines didn't start moving until well over an hour after I placed my wagers. Yes, Chicago lost, but I had played Columbus for more, so I was still swindled out of a profit in the end. Even if it was a fairly minimal profit that was stolen, it is about principle. They never should of been voided at all. Here is their explanation on live chat: "I checked the line history on those games we did have a problem with our linemover that was not responding to changes on those games at the time you placed your wagers the line was off significantly on both games it should have been Columbus -185 at 12:35 and Chicago -200 at 1:08 the lines closed Chicago -230 / Columbus -200" I bet the same wagers at the same time for the same price on two other books (5D, BOL). I don't have a screenshot of my HRW bet slips as they deleted all evidence of them from my history, but as you can see from the transcript, he mentioned my time stamps on them were 12:35 for Columbus and 1:08 for Chicago. Here is the proof I bet them on 5D and BOL at the same time for the same price as well. And here is a screenshot of the line history. I included a 5D and Heritage feed for two different sources. You do the math. Apparently HRW's line manager is Nostradamus and could predict the line moves several hours before any other book could. lol

Typo'd my username wrong on google docs with a 9 instead of a 0.