IAG

On 1/29/2024 at 7:21 PM, mikeman said:

How come swift has never done the super bowl halftime show?

Looks like because as a spokesperson for Coke, she was unable to perform at a Pepsi sponsored event,.

https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/articles/features/why_taylor_swift_hasnt_played_the_super_bowl_halftime_show-146603

16 hours ago, mikeman said:

How come swift has never done the super bowl halftime show?

Pretty sure she’s never wanted to. She’s done the National Anthem at World Series game.

25 minutes ago, mikeman said:

That ones not as good, never heard it either, apparently I'm not hip to the taylor scene.

Surely you’ve heard this one Mike.

When Kanye was so obnoxious to Taylor, even Obama weighed in.  

Fast forward to pop..probably her biggest song. 
 

15 years ago…when she was still “country.” 1 billion + views

2 hours ago, WVU said:

I know you guys are funning here but Taylor Swift will go down as the top selling and most successful artist in history.  

+1

On 1/28/2024 at 5:04 PM, Jimmy Hoffa said:

10 years from now she'll be stripping on Only Fans...

She’s a billionaire, so I would hope not. 

BTC has been dying since $2.00.   Who knows, maybe someday there will really be a nail in the coffin, but impossible to predict and I’m not too worried.

#BTC

ETF approval was a sell the news event. FTX sold a bunch of their holdings in GBTC after approval, Terraforma labs filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy yesterday. 
 

We have been here before.  Mt Gox, FTX, Ongoing China FUD.  Every time it feels like it won’t recover.   
 

You going to have a herd of buckle bunnies House?

21 minutes ago, mikeman said:

Very few cowboy hats in my neck of the woods, when i go out to the black hills in the summer there are lots, it's a good look if you can carry it off.

Yep. They are everywhere, especially certain times of year..

14 hours ago, mikeman said:

What does this mean? Scan what? 50 what?

Scan the barcode.   My first scan was Sugar Free Red Bull—39/100 “poor”     No surprise there.  I’ll give it a shot today.  Cool concept, just not sure I’d stick with it, or take their suggestions. 

10 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

This is from the state's website. The mother does not have a parenting plan. Dad files for one today. But it says, without one law enforcement may not be able to help you.

I’m not sure what you mean by parenting plan. If you mean formal custody agreement awarded after a custody hearing, she doesn’t need one, she already has presumptive custody.  Filing doesn’t change that unless accompanied by a granted TRO or the like. The cops may not be able to take him, esp on a weekend, but there is no way in hell son gets to keep him more  than a few days, much less til May,  if they get a lawyer and/or go to the courts. And again, will not look good during the actual custody hearing.

6 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

Of course and I agree with you.

However my son feels that in her current mental state she could leave town on a whim or some such other dumb thing. Filing protects him and spells out both her and his rights per a judge's determination.

You are putting too much emphasis on the word “filing.”

one more. 

2 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

I can not find any such language in the Washington Administrative Code or the Revised Code of Washington.

Only on websites that want to generate business for their legal firms...

lol ok.  I have my own fish to fry.  GL.

1 minute ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

She abandoned the baby and left the family home.

Had he not filed a parenting plan with the court first and we tried that stunt on Sunday it could go that way I suppose. But right now with him having filed it's up to the court to adjudicate the matter.

 No. When you file for divorce, you aren’t divorced.   Your son does not have any rights until court signs off and that will be months from now.     You try this, she will get kid back and not allow your son any custody til May. .  And it will be considered in court guaranteed that he is a risk to take and keep the baby if given custody.

18 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

Let's play this out some...

Nobody has been ordered to do anything to this point and only a verbal agreement is in place. So, how exactly would police enforce her visitation when visitation has yet to be established by a court's ruling on the documents we filed this morning??

Exactly!!!! Because there is no order, the mother LEGALLY has  custody.   If she has chosen to let him have him every other week, great, but can be revoked by her  at any point with no order.  Court will likely give him at least partial…father’s rights are huge these days, but it’s not automatic. It starts out in favor of mom. 

Focus only on the first paragraph.  I understand your anger and frustration but I just want you do have things done correctly even if it means sucking it up for a while now til things can be handled correctly thru the courts.  
 

This one isn’t specific to Washington like the other one, but maybe it conveys better.  However everything I’ve read indicates it holds true for Washington. 

1 minute ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

https://www.mollybkenny.com/blog/divorce-myth-7-mothers-are-favored-for-custody-of-children.cfm#:~:text=When considering a parenting plan,and never to the father.

When considering a parenting plan, the court is legally obligated to consider several important factors about your case. Whether a parent is the mother or father is not one of those factors. It’s a myth that courts in Washington will always award custody to the mother and never to the father.

 

 

You’re right when THE COURT DECIDES.   Until then…oh well..I’m beating a dead horse.   As a decade long paralegal,I would like to think I know a little something about how the courtsystem works.    You’re seeing the big picture and not the one in place now.   It’s like a person  being free on bail until her court date and then things will be decided. 

Just now, mikeman said:

The way i read that page IAG posted she will have default rights even if he has established paternity.

Exactly

4 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

Paternity is established and dad is on the birth certificate.

Then he has the right to seek custody and will likely get in court (see blip above…if this is established then they can CREATE A PATH I.e. get the proper court docs in order which you’ve done) ,,., but until then, mother has the sole custodial right. If they had been married at time of birth, he would have equal right to custody immediately l.  Because they weren’t, there are some hoops to jump thru.   PLEASE at least make a phone call to a family law attorney before doing something that could jeopardize his rights in the future.