Machiavelli

That’s fair. Not sure I fully agree—as I came to dig conservative criticisms about these social media places—but I cannot argue that your position doesn’t have merit. Fair way to look at it n stay hands off.

Case in point on what isn’t really “your win” since you just put their free $$$ back in and got even more free $$$. Guy thinks using free cheddar on the best player in the world makes him sharp. F that. KingKolzig picks better winners.

Wouldn’t moderating/censoring it be in effect a de facto type authoring? Because allowing stuff to stay n forcing others to go is a form of publishing, no? (Btw, conservatives have been on that position, so you being removed is noteworthy to me)

That’s option A, but Jimmy giving even better ideas! Rev easy days are soon to be over! You’re gonna have to follow KingKolzig props from here on out.

Him winning this much is oppressive to me. Good idea!

About to get a third MVP.. IN A ROW! In a league where Ja Morant exists. Just wow.

Messaging won Dems the midterms (as predicted), so I’d be wise to get my messaging game in order before ratting out my pal.

Thanks! Maybe I’ll get lucky with my 12.12 play!

I’m generally inclined to agree with this, but they want to be treated like a Platform n not a Publisher. Yet act as a Publisher, so shouldn’t publishing guidelines be in play? Or nah?

Ooo! That saves me 12.12 that I can use on a losing parlay!

Declare them a Publisher n change 230 already.

But since ratting people out is what the cool kids do now, F it..

Last two suggestions are excellent. Need to put a stop to this. Only honest, FairPlay should be allowed!

I did not.

He’s gotten all these boosts handed to him, then he takes the free winnings, puts a massive amount on -330 type stuff n collects “free money” over n over again. Needs to be ratted out.

Revolver a personal friend of mine for years, but if push came to shove, Kolzig gets to keep the moniker and Rev should change.

Got a reply; Imma rat him out!!

Ha, nah. Being genuine. He’s sorta fixed in his assholeness at times, so kinda thought he may be a stud type—since that’s a hallmark. Him actually being regular gives credence to some of his views—whether he appreciates that coming from me or not.

Guy has been winning in ways that are almost equivalent to scamming; should I notify them n hopefully compel them to ban his account. Admittedly, I’m jealous of his easy wins lately.

Cool to see that you’re just a regular person. Was expecting a sorta stud type given your brashness. But being a regular person n fine putting yourself out there like that is cool to see.

I’ll let QueenRev or Iggy tell me behind the scenes if I need to pay attention to anything cucky says, but I’ll exit for now with a bit of parting wisdom: Given that “Conservatives are the new criers” and prone to be “addicted to outrage,” a lot of dudes who only associate firmly right nowadays are too into immediately replying with outrage/insults/etc, and well, being too excited to do so after another man speaks/types/writes makes that a person a bit… Cucky.

I’m of the mind that two things are true: -National Security elements need to be taken seriously -Companies/Govt can operate unfairly under that guise (for which conservatives called that out from the jump) Bonus thought is how FBI letter situation pushed me n others from Clinton to Trump, and lack of Hunter follow through was able to have myself n others comfortable with Biden over Trump. Those things can be the final things to sway moderates at the end.

I’ve lost 4 epic (for me) parlays by small margins these past two weeks. 😒😒😒😒

Not reading cucky’s replies, but I will say the few times I read him across the way before, I thought he had some sharpness to him. But again, people get stuck in a mindset and that can overshadow all else about them.

“True intelligence is displayed in the real world.” -HinesWard paraphrased (which I agree with, but posting something in the thread since cucky mentioned me)