Jump to content

Who else bet $1,000 on Lomachenko to win $14?


KingRevolver
 Share

Recommended Posts

1/9 horses at all US thoroughbred tracks have won 79.09% of their races from 1/1/13 through yesterday. Blindly betting them all to win would have yielded a -14.02% ROI - significantly better than the average track takeout.

Sorry, it's whatever number I said, when I pull a number out of my ass, it's spot on. :laugh

 

i dont give a shit about horse racing , except for an occasional bet on a triple crown race, it's been decades since i bet the pony's, what's the point of these stupid questions? if I think that guy was an idiot for betting 1k to win 14 bucks, and you think he's a genius, that's ok, opinions are like assholes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, it's whatever number I said, when I pull a number out of my ass, it's spot on. :laugh

 

i dont give a shit about horse racing , except for an occasional bet on a triple crown race, it's been decades since i bet the pony's, what's the point of these stupid questions? if I think that guy was an idiot for betting 1k to win 14 bucks, and you think he's a genius, that's ok, opinions are like assholes.

Retard alert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, it's whatever number I said, when I pull a number out of my ass, it's spot on. :laugh

 

i dont give a shit about horse racing , except for an occasional bet on a triple crown race, it's been decades since i bet the pony's, what's the point of these stupid questions? if I think that guy was an idiot for betting 1k to win 14 bucks, and you think he's a genius, that's ok, opinions are like assholes.

Math isn't an opinion. It's either wrong or right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You made up a number on a topic that YOU brought up because you have no idea what you're talking about and are incapable of doing the math necessary to get the correct answer (i.e. not an opinion).

 

That's clearly the dumbass.

I have no interest in horseracing, or your silly questions, and since the odds on the lovachink fight(a singular event)t have no connection to any other fight that's ever occurred in history, there are no mathematical calculations that can tell which is the correct side to bet.

 

It's good talking to you though, I'm learning quite a bit. :jerk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. Zero math involved. The odds are pulled out of thin air the same as yours as if neither fighter has fought before.

 

Stay stupid.

Ok, I buy it the oddsmakers did the math and came up with exactly -7000...wow, what are the odds of that?

 

I'm sure you are really smart though, that's why you're wasting your time arguing with me on a wed afternoon. :laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've admittedly lost $100k-$200k gambling but think you know what you're talking about. Pretty much the same boat as Brock Landers. Well done. You've got it all figured out.

A drop in the bucket mboy, I've never claimed to be a winning gambler, I'm smarter than most, but still a loser. I was like you when I was younger, I would try to correct people, show them that i was right, etc. Decades later you'll realize that it's not worth arguing about, you'll never make people smarter and they'll never listen anyway.

 

Anymore tips on how to bet 1-9 shots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...