Jump to content

Trump Appreciation and 2020 Keep America Great Campaign

RaiseThese

By RaiseThese,
in Main Stage

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 968
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Check out the Silent Majority trying to set the Trump Boat Parade record yesterday(officials have to review tapes to see if they made it)

You think these good folks are going to be sitting around eating that BULLSHIT the Dems are trying to feed the country,

 

Either way it was glorious and No one was killed or got their boat burned or hijacked!!!

 

 

Longer Live stream footage..scrub through for some nice shots

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Watch the Trump rallies live

 

Upcoming Trump Rallies

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

pretty interesting take from NY post.last NOV,,  notice the last paragraph

https://nypost.com/2019/11/02/why-obama-got-a-nobel-peace-prize-for-nothing-and-trump-never-will-for-anything/

 

Why Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize for nothing — and Trump never will for anything

November 2, 2019

 
"It is true, [barack] Obama did not do much before winning" a Nobel Peace Prize, says author Geir Lundestad, who was on the committee who awarded it to him. SIPA USA/SIPA
 

President Barack Obama’s first act as a Nobel Peace Prize winner in 2009 — nine months after he took the oath of office — was to try to wriggle out of accepting it.

“The morning the prize was announced, his staff investigated whether anyone had failed to travel to Oslo to receive their prize,” writes Nobel insider Geir Lundestad in “The World’s Most Prestigious Prize” (Oxford), out this month.

Apparently, the president was among the 61 percent of Americans who believed he didn’t deserve it.

“It is true, Obama did not do much before winning,” Lundestad, 74, a member of Norway’s Nobel Committee until 2014, told The Post. “But he represented the ideals of the committee. And when we have an American president who supports that message, we like to strengthen him.”

Obama’s advisers soon decided the honor could not be refused. But as ridicule rained down on the committee for handing a peacemaker’s award to a man who was ordering drone strikes on civilians overseas, the White House grew increasingly hesitant, dithering for weeks over how much of the traditional three-day awards gala he would attend.

 

In the end, Obama stayed just long enough to deliver an acceptance speech that tried to justify the wars he was waging in Iraq and Afghanistan — rationalizations that visibly irked First Lady Michelle Obama.

“Did you have to go there?” she asked when he concluded, according to Lundestad’s book.

The committee’s risky choice backfired, Lundestad admits, as the new president took flak from all sides for accepting it before he had accomplished any of his lofty foreign policy goals. Even supporters like Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus called the prize “ridiculous — embarrassing, even.” David Axelrod, a top Obama advisor, said it was “more of a surreal challenge than a cause for celebration.”

 

 

 

“It would be difficult, even impossible, for Obama to live up to the enormous expectations,” Lundestad writes. “I personally greatly doubted their decision.”

But the committee members took the chance out of sheer exultation that a Republican no longer resided in the White House, Lundestad suggests in his book, an expanded English-language version of a memoir he published in Norwegian in 2015.

Of the 100 Nobel Peace Prizes bestowed since 1901, 22 of them have gone to Americans — far more than any other nation in the world. The entire continent of Africa has produced only 11 Peace Prize winners, including this year’s laureate, Abiy Ahmed of Ethiopia.

It’s a matter of geopolitics, Lundestad explained. “It is always Norwegian policy to maintain a good relationship with the United States,” he said. “Russia is our neighbor, and we need a big friend.”

 

 

The Nobel Committee, under the terms of Alfred Nobel’s 1895 will, is made up of prominent Norwegians who share a particular worldview.

The resulting philosophy of “liberal internationalism” prioritizes globalist organizations over national governments and boosts ideas like arms control and environmentalism.

 

“To Norwegians it is almost as if the USA is split in two,” Lundestad writes. “A liberal and democratic country with which we feel solidarity and a conservative country for which we have little respect.”

Three of the four prize-winning American presidents have been Democrats: Obama, Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter. The sole Republican is Theodore Roosevelt, who won it in 1906 as a progressive whose outlook bears little resemblance to that of today’s GOP.

Almost all of the other US honorees — such as Al Gore, Martin Luther King Jr. and anti-nuclear activist Linus Pauling — have been on the left end of our political spectrum. “The warmth of our relationship with the US is of course much higher with a left-of-center president,” Lundestad said.

Ronald Reagan was pointedly snubbed in 1990 when the Soviet Union’s Mikhail Gorbachev won a solo Peace Prize for ending the Cold War.

“Gorbachev was not a true democrat, obviously,” Lundestad said — making him one of the committee’s most controversial picks. But Reagan’s peace-through-strength policies were so unpopular in Norway that a Nobel for him was unthinkable.

 

President Trump has been nominated for the prize by two Norwegian legislators — valid nominators, under committee rules — for his peace overtures to North Korea. But his “America First” ideology and aversion to globalism make him an equally unlikely candidate. “I probably will never get it,” Trump said in February. “I think I’ll get a Nobel Prize for a lot of things — if they gave it out fairly, which they don’t,” Trump complained again during September’s UN General Assembly.

It’s the one thing on which Lundestad and the president agree.

 

“I would be extremely surprised if Donald Trump ever received the Nobel Peace Prize,” Lundestad said. “He may say he wants to bring peace to the Middle East or the Korean Peninsula, but he has not accomplished anything,” he added. “And his policies do not fall into line with the ideas of liberal internationalism” — no matter how those efforts may turn out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Professor Rockstar

Professor

Posted
Posted

Check out the Silent Majority trying to set the Trump Boat Parade record yesterday(officials have to review tapes to see if they made it)

You think these good folks are going to be sitting around eating that BULLSHIT the Dems are trying to feed the country,

 

Either way it was glorious and No one was killed or got their boat burned or hijacked!!!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K90lQB3sUm0

 

Longer Live stream footage..scrub through for some nice shots

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jgI_Lj3BIY

did they get the record? Amazing turn out!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

did they get the record? Amazing turn out!

https://www.wfla.com/news/local-news/guinness-confirms-its-reviewing-trump-boat-parade-world-record-attempt/

 

Guinness confirmed to WFLA.com that it is reviewing the attempt.

“We can confirm we have received an application for this title and attempt. We are currently awaiting evidence to review,” Guinness Public Relations Manager Amanda Marcus told WFLA.com.

Saturday’s boat parade organized in the Gulf just north of Pier 60 on Clearwater Beach. The official boat count took place at the Welch Causeway Bridge in Madiera Beach.

Marcus said it may take up to 12-15 weeks for Guinness to fully review the evidence submitted by the boat parade organizers.

“Once received and reviewed, our Records Management Team will then confirm the success or failure of the record attempt,” she said.

 

 

NO idea why it takes so long for someone to watch a video and count boats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i remember reading this story when it happened. The filthbags

burned it down before it even opened. Brand new bar gone.

 

What is the huge surprise though?

I dont know any specifics but at end of the clip Trump said he would find a way for the govt to help them out.

Who knows what that means in politics but I would be surprised if he didnt find a way to make the couple better off than they were yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Nice, Trump pardons Susan B Anthony and the Left tries to cancel her on the same day.

 

 

 

NY Times, NowThis accused of trying to 'cancel' Susan B. Anthony, Dems blast Trump pardon Tuesday marked the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-nowthis-accused-of-trying-to-cancel-susan-b-anthony-dems-blast-trump-pardon

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RaiseThese Rockstar

RaiseThese

Posted
  • Author
Posted

https://apnews.com/5e833a62e9492f6a66624b7920cc846a

 

Trump campaign’s Russia contacts ‘grave’ threat, Senate says

Please say a prayer for YOUR PRESIDENT before going to sleep tonite under the blanket of freedom that he provides you.

(I dont care that it is a bed bug ridden , cum stained blanket in a seedy hotel)

 

They been spinning that same story for years man and STILL there is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with it. I bolded the relevant portions for you.

 

Here is an excerpt from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-report-russian-interference-2016-us-election/

 

The Senate committee's report itself does not offer any meaningful treatment of, or explicit conclusion regarding, the subject of "collusion," a legally nebulous, politically charged term that once saw wide use. But the committee's acting chairman, Republican Senator Marco Rubio, said in an accompanying statement that the panel's investigators "found absolutely no evidence" that the Trump campaign "colluded" with the Russians. He said the committee did find "irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling."

 

The Trump campaign, in a statement, likewise declared the report showed "no collusion" while decrying the "Russia Collusion Hoax" as "the greatest political scandal in the history of this country."

 

 

Senator Mark Warner, the committee's vice chairman, avoided references to "collusion" but said the report details "a breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives that is a very real counterintelligence threat to our elections."

"This cannot happen again," the Virginia Democrat said. "As we head into the heat of the 2020 campaign season, I strongly urge campaigns, the executive branch, Congress and the American people to heed the lessons of this report in order to protect our democracy."

 

In additional views appended to the report, other Democrats on the panel said the report "unambiguously shows that members of the Trump Campaign cooperated with Russian efforts to get Trump elected," and, pointing specifically to Manafort's interactions with Kilimnik, said "this is what collusion looks like." 

 

Committee Republicans — apart from the former chairman, Richard Burr, who did not sign on — said in their addendum that "the Russian government inappropriately meddled in our 2016 general election in many ways but then-Candidate Trump was not complicit." They also harshly criticized the FBI for "sloppy work and poor judgment," principally for its handling of information contained in the dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

Footer title

This is an example of a list.

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

×
×
  • Create New...