Jump to content

video: sleepy addresses the forum clown plus a pick


sleepy
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 375
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Joe, it was too late to do this week fairly. I was on the fucking golf course when this prick put up a challenge.

So it's only fair to do this next week

U should match the winners share pal...

I'll knock this Jody fuck up the side of his head

True story. Guy couldn't hear the alerts on his phone while running the leaf blower in front of the guys golfing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe, it was too late to do this week fairly. I was on the fucking golf course when this prick put up a challenge.

 

So it's only fair to do this next week

 

U should match the winners share pal...

 

I'll knock this Jody fuck up the side of his head

You were on no golf course whatsoever, quit with the fairy tales. Any pro would be locked and loaded ready to attack Sleepy with great vngenance and furious anger

 

You, on the other hand, are just a posing Non heterosexual person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a golf course and a guy with a golf club in his hands.

 

Close enough.

it's undoubtedly stonewall; the hole the guy who was forced to play with him is on is the 4th hole. stonewall is a real nice course; doubtful that brock paid though.

 

i'll give brock this, he didn't wear jeans. does look like he's wearing some saucony sneakers though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My line:

 

Sleepy -150

Brock +140

 

based on assumptions in this handy sim I wrote


import random
import numpy as np
##sleepy brock sim

brock_wins = .48
sleepy_wins = .54
num_sims = 100000

def simBets(brock_wins, sleepy_wins):
    sleepy_results, brock_results = [],[]
    ##brock bet
    for x in range(10):
        if random.random() < brock_wins:
            brock_results.append(1)
        else:
            brock_results.append(-1.1)
    ##sleepy bet
    for x in range(10):
        if random.random() < sleepy_wins:
            sleepy_results.append(1)
        else:
            sleepy_results.append(-1.1)
    sleepy_total = np.sum(sleepy_results)
    brock_total =  np.sum(brock_results)
    if sleepy_total > brock_total:
        return(1)
    elif sleepy_total == brock_total:
        return(2)
    else:
        return(0)
        
def runSim(numSims, brock_wins, sleepy_wins):
    brockWins, sleepyWins, tie = 0,0,0
    for x in range(numSims):
        result = simBets(brock_wins, sleepy_wins)
        if result == 1:
            sleepyWins += 1
        elif result == 2:
            tie += 1
        else:
            brockWins +=1
    return(sleepyWins, brockWins, tie)
    
sleepyWins, brockWins, tie = runSim(num_sims, brock_wins, sleepy_wins)

print("sleepy wins", sleepyWins/(sleepyWins+brockWins))
                

 

I'm showing about a 4.3% edge on Sleepy at those numbers.  I threw together a sim real quick too and had different results than you.  So, I did a little digging and found a problem in one of my loops.  Instead of using a sim, you can use combinatorics to check the math.  Something like this...

 

brocksleepy.png

 

 

These should be the precise probabilities at 54%/48%.  I just ran a 100k sim and got approximately the same results.  I don't see the issue in your code offhand though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a 25 maybe 27. Plays upright, finishes high no shoulders, handsy takeaway. Plays short and left to right.

this is actually a little too generous for me; based on that swing and finish, and the fact that he's wearing sneakers and likely using women's or childrens clubs, brock strikes me more as a "didn't keep real score" kind of guy which puts his handicap somewhere around 35-40 and that might be a bit generous even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm showing about a 4.3% edge on Sleepy at those numbers.  I threw together a sim real quick too and had different results than you.  So, I did a little digging and found a problem in one of my loops.  Instead of using a sim, you can use combinatorics to check the math.  Something like this...

 

brocksleepy.png

 

 

These should be the precise probabilities at 54%/48%.  I just ran a 100k sim and got approximately the same results.  I don't see the issue in your code offhand though.

 

yea thats exactly what i get with the sim, i just threw up -150 as something close since obviously brock isn't realy 48%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...