Jump to content

They need to audit the vote...


KingRevolver
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Behind in all the polls... but won every swing state. First time that has ever happened. Never change, Russian hackers! :laugh

We know why that was. Polls were always inaccurate due to the hidden Trumpers. People who were afraid to voice their support due to fears of being labeled a racist. Same thing happened on super Tuesday I believe...or one of those big primary nights. I'm not so sure why people were so surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden Trumptards... now I've heard it all.

They were talked about throughout the entire election...obviously underestimated, but Trump campaign knew they were out there, as did most people.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-shy-voters-polls-gop-insiders-230411

 

 

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article98915057.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting who is actually unwilling to accept the results of the election.

 

So much fucking hypocrisy in this country between the sheep, it's repulsive.

Hard to accept a democracy in which the loser got 2 million more votes than the winner, pal. Surely you can understand that, given that it's going to be the largest discrepancy in votes between a winner and loser in US history.

 

Isn't it ironic that Trump called the Electoral College undemocratic before and now praises it? Hypocrisy, indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to accept a democracy in which the loser got 2 million more votes than the winner pal.

 

Isn't it ironic that Trump called the Electoral College undemocratic before and now praises it? Hypocrisy, indeed.

 

Yes, I know it's difficult for many sheep to accept the Constitution.

 

Two wrongs make a right in hypocrisy world.  Justify away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to accept a democracy in which the loser got 2 million more votes than the winner, pal. Surely you can understand that, given that it's going to be the largest discrepancy in votes between a winner and loser in US history.

 

Isn't it ironic that Trump called the Electoral College undemocratic before and now praises it? Hypocrisy, indeed.

Trump told the nytimes yesterday that he'd prefer a popular vote, but that if it was so he'd have campaigned in California and new York and he'd have won too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hillary had more votes than Obama in 2008, oh the outrage.

 

How about less complaining and find out why she lost the swing states instead.

LOL says who?

First of all, the primaries are much harder to calculate popular vote with the Caucases and depending on how you allocated votes and uncommitted votes Obama won the popular in that as well.

 

Comparing primaries to general is just terrible. It wasn't close. 2 million isn't close pal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL says who?

 

First of all, the primaries are much harder to calculate popular vote with the Caucases and depending on how you allocated votes and uncommitted votes Obama won the popular in that as well.

 

Comparing primaries to general is just terrible. It wasn't close. 2 million isn't close pal.

Why do you think she lost the rust belt outside of Illinois?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...