Jump to content

Attorney General tells Trump to stick ban up his ass


The Dark Man
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dumb, dumb! It is a Muslim ban. In the EO it says persecuted Christians from these countries are exempt from the ban. These 7 countries are predominantly Muslim, but if you're a Christian you can disregard the ban.

 

Rudy Giuliani even stated publically Trump ask him how to do a Muslim ban.

 

Trump violating the Constitution left and right!

 

Fuken White Supremist's! Ruining this country.

 

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-01-30-muslim-ban-a-total-lie-fact-less-media-gins-up-mass-hysteria-among-left-wing-zombie-trolls.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 549
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice source mil mike. Jfc.

 

Trump said no one respects the generals more than him but he doesn't listen to his top one. Kind of weird.

 

edit: not talking about the Attonrey General obviously, talking military, but don't want Trump tards to get the wrong idea.

 

attack the source rather than the facts

 

do you know that obama banned travel from those exact same countries 8 times during his administration?  or that obama banned all iraqis from entering the united states for 6 months?

 

where was the outrage then...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

attack the source rather than the facts

 

do you know that obama banned travel from those exact same countries 8 times during his administration?  or that obama banned all iraqis from entering the united states for 6 months?

 

where was the outrage then...

He never banned anyone. You can honestly keep posting nonsense over and over again, but it's not true.

 

Obama delayed new visa approvals for refugees - he didn't decline previous people granted visas. He slowed the program to implement a tougher vetting program. He didn't deny current visa holders.

 

You are posting complete and udder nonsense that has been debunked time and time again.

 

“President Obama never imposed a six-month ban on Iraqi processing. For several months in 2011, there was a lower level of Iraqi resettlement, as the government implemented certain security enhancements. Indeed, as we identified new and valuable opportunities to enhance screening, we did so. Nobody should object to a continual effort to identify legitimate enhancements, but it is disreputable to use that as a pretext to effectively shut down a program that is overwhelmingly safe and has enabled the United States to exercise world leadership. In any event, there was never a point during that period in which Iraqi resettlement was stopped, or banned.”

 

The Pinocchio Test

So what’s the difference with Trump’s action?

First, Obama responded to an actual threat — the discovery that two Iraqi refugees had been implicated in bombmaking in Iraq that had targeted U.S. troops. (Iraq, after all, was a war zone.) Under congressional pressure, officials decided to reexamine all previous refugees and impose new screening procedures, which led to a slowdown in processing new applications. Trump, by contrast, issued his executive order without any known triggering threat. (His staff has pointed to attacks unrelated to the countries named in his order.)

Second, Obama did not announce a ban on visa applications. In fact, as seen in Napolitano’s answer to Collins, administration officials danced around that question. There was certainly a lot of news reporting that visa applications had slowed to a trickle. But the Obama administration never said it had a policy to halt all applications. Indeed, it is now clear that no ban was put in place. Even so, the delays did not go unnoticed, so there was a lot of critical news reporting at the time about the angst of Iraqis waiting for approval.

Third, Obama’s policy did not prevent all citizens of that country, including green-card holders, from traveling to the United States. Trump’s policy is much more sweeping, though officials have appeared to pull back from barring permanent U.S. residents.

We have sought comment from the White House and from Obama administration officials and so may update this if more information becomes available. But so far this is worthy of at least Two Pinocchios.

Update: In light of the response from Obama administration officials that there never was a point when Iraqi resettlement was stopped or banned, we are updating this ruling to Three Pinocchios. Iraqi refugee processing was slowed, in response to a specific threat, but it was not halted. The Trump White House, meanwhile, has failed to provide any evidence for its statement.

Three Pinocchios

pinocchio_3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what the fukk mess is this

 

this quack once wrote an article about a homeopathic cure for ebola

 

no shit

 

there are natural cures for everything, if you don't want to believe that nature provides us with the means to prevent and counteract sickness then that's on you

 

you probably believe the american cancer society and drug companies want to cure cancer  :laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He never banned anyone. You can honestly keep posting nonsense over and over again, but it's not true.

 

Obama delayed new visa approvals for refugees - he didn't decline previous people granted visas. He slowed the program to implement a tougher vetting program. He didn't deny current visa holders.

 

You are posting complete and udder nonsense that has been debunked time and time again.

 

“President Obama never imposed a six-month ban on Iraqi processing. For several months in 2011, there was a lower level of Iraqi resettlement, as the government implemented certain security enhancements. Indeed, as we identified new and valuable opportunities to enhance screening, we did so. Nobody should object to a continual effort to identify legitimate enhancements, but it is disreputable to use that as a pretext to effectively shut down a program that is overwhelmingly safe and has enabled the United States to exercise world leadership. In any event, there was never a point during that period in which Iraqi resettlement was stopped, or banned.”

 

The Pinocchio Test

So what’s the difference with Trump’s action?

First, Obama responded to an actual threat — the discovery that two Iraqi refugees had been implicated in bombmaking in Iraq that had targeted U.S. troops. (Iraq, after all, was a war zone.) Under congressional pressure, officials decided to reexamine all previous refugees and impose new screening procedures, which led to a slowdown in processing new applications. Trump, by contrast, issued his executive order without any known triggering threat. (His staff has pointed to attacks unrelated to the countries named in his order.)

Second, Obama did not announce a ban on visa applications. In fact, as seen in Napolitano’s answer to Collins, administration officials danced around that question. There was certainly a lot of news reporting that visa applications had slowed to a trickle. But the Obama administration never said it had a policy to halt all applications. Indeed, it is now clear that no ban was put in place. Even so, the delays did not go unnoticed, so there was a lot of critical news reporting at the time about the angst of Iraqis waiting for approval.

Third, Obama’s policy did not prevent all citizens of that country, including green-card holders, from traveling to the United States. Trump’s policy is much more sweeping, though officials have appeared to pull back from barring permanent U.S. residents.

We have sought comment from the White House and from Obama administration officials and so may update this if more information becomes available. But so far this is worthy of at least Two Pinocchios.

Update: In light of the response from Obama administration officials that there never was a point when Iraqi resettlement was stopped or banned, we are updating this ruling to Three Pinocchios. Iraqi refugee processing was slowed, in response to a specific threat, but it was not halted. The Trump White House, meanwhile, has failed to provide any evidence for its statement.

Three Pinocchios

pinocchio_3.jpg

 

blah blah blah

 

maybe learn the difference between udder and utter, before you insult someone else, you total moron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are natural cures for everything, if you don't want to believe that nature provides us with the means to prevent and counteract sickness then that's on you

 

you probably believe the american cancer society and drug companies want to cure cancer  :laugh

 

Quackery

 

I'd take my foreign relations tip from Teddy before this filet o fukk

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...