Raise's Revelations.....The Best is Yet to Come....Nothing Can Stop What is Coming Legacy

[RaiseThese]

3 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said:

FACTS: At no point were illegitimate ballots duplicated or inserted into the duplication process. To ensure ballots can be counted for voters that are in the military, temporarily overseas, vote using a large print or braille ballots, or who return a ballot too damaged to be read by a tabulator, Maricopa County duplicates these ballots. During the duplication process, the Elections Department assigns a matching serial number to both the original and duplicated ballot. This number can be used to compare the original ballot with the duplicated ballot.

The accuracy and completeness of Maricopa County’s duplication process was confirmed in court (Ward v. Jackson) where the plaintiffs randomly sampled 1,626 of the 27,000 duplicated ballots. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling, “conclude[ing], unanimously, that . . . the challenge fails to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden Electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.” (Ariz. S. Ct., December 9, 2020)

There may be some instances where the serial number was printed over the timing mark on the original damaged ballot. Since the duplicated ballot and not the original is tabulated, the added serial number overlapping a timing mark does not impact tabulation. When reviewing the randomly sampled duplicated ballots in Ward vs. Jackson, we were able to find and reconcile the serial numbers for all ballots reviewed.

There he goes , what a fucking moronic sheep

lol a random sample of about 6 percent is better than looking at ALL the info......

Keep on posting up bullshit pal, just make sure your heath insurance is paid up....hahaha

[zzmocashzz]

Just now, RaiseThese said:

There he goes , what a fucking moronic sheep

lol a random sample of about 6 percent is better than looking at ALL the info......

 

you keep holding on to hope raise. it's all you got 

[zzmocashzz]

[Jimmy Hoffa]

Mustn't be rude Zz...

This a very big day for Raise.

[RaiseThese]

56 minutes ago, RaiseThese said:

Sloppy cheating

A muther fucker would have to be in serious denial to look at this ONE piece of evidence and think shit was run on the square.

[zzmocashzz]

[RaiseThese]

1 minute ago, Jimmy Hoffa said:

Mustn't be rude Zz...

This a very big day for Raise.

Its a BIG day for Truth

Its a BIG day for Patriots

Its a BIG day for America

 

Even if you dont give a shit, others do

[joeybagadonuts]

1 minute ago, RaiseThese said:

A muther fucker would have to be in serious denial to look at this ONE piece of evidence and think shit was run on the square.

[MonkeyF0cker]

16 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said:

FACTS: At no point were illegitimate ballots duplicated or inserted into the duplication process. To ensure ballots can be counted for voters that are in the military, temporarily overseas, vote using a large print or braille ballots, or who return a ballot too damaged to be read by a tabulator, Maricopa County duplicates these ballots. During the duplication process, the Elections Department assigns a matching serial number to both the original and duplicated ballot. This number can be used to compare the original ballot with the duplicated ballot.

The accuracy and completeness of Maricopa County’s duplication process was confirmed in court (Ward v. Jackson) where the plaintiffs randomly sampled 1,626 of the 27,000 duplicated ballots. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling, “conclude[ing], unanimously, that . . . the challenge fails to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden Electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.” (Ariz. S. Ct., December 9, 2020)

There may be some instances where the serial number was printed over the timing mark on the original damaged ballot. Since the duplicated ballot and not the original is tabulated, the added serial number overlapping a timing mark does not impact tabulation. When reviewing the randomly sampled duplicated ballots in Ward vs. Jackson, we were able to find and reconcile the serial numbers for all ballots reviewed.

So the guy with more PhD.'s from MIT than you have brain cells just completely made everything up?

Is that what you're claiming?

[zzmocashzz]

[RaiseThese]

Fuck a recount you brain dead moron...this is a FULL Gold Standard Audit

I dont blame you , enjoy your time "in power", this is literally the height of D control and they have no where to go but down.....

 

[MonkeyF0cker]

24 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said:

FACTS: At no point were illegitimate ballots duplicated or inserted into the duplication process. To ensure ballots can be counted for voters that are in the military, temporarily overseas, vote using a large print or braille ballots, or who return a ballot too damaged to be read by a tabulator, Maricopa County duplicates these ballots. During the duplication process, the Elections Department assigns a matching serial number to both the original and duplicated ballot. This number can be used to compare the original ballot with the duplicated ballot.

The accuracy and completeness of Maricopa County’s duplication process was confirmed in court (Ward v. Jackson) where the plaintiffs randomly sampled 1,626 of the 27,000 duplicated ballots. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling, “conclude[ing], unanimously, that . . . the challenge fails to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden Electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.” (Ariz. S. Ct., December 9, 2020)

There may be some instances where the serial number was printed over the timing mark on the original damaged ballot. Since the duplicated ballot and not the original is tabulated, the added serial number overlapping a timing mark does not impact tabulation. When reviewing the randomly sampled duplicated ballots in Ward vs. Jackson, we were able to find and reconcile the serial numbers for all ballots reviewed.

That whole thing you just quoted is actually a complete lie.

They used that sample to claim that the election results wouldn't have been changed by duplicate ballots alone by extrapolating the errors they DID find in the samples to the entire number of ballots.

Directly from the court decision...

"The first review was of 100 ballots and the
second  was  of  1526  ballots,  and  of  the  1626  total,  there  were  nine
errors,  (1617  correct  duplicate  ballots)  that  if  correct  would  have
given  the  Trump  Electors  an  additional  seven  votes  and  the  Biden
Electors  an  additional  two  votes.  The  Secretary  maintains  that  this
constitutes  an  error  of  no  more  than  0.37%  within  the  sample."

https://recorder.maricopa.gov/justthefacts/courtcases/7 Ward v. Jackson (AZ Supreme Court)/Ward v. Jackson APPEAL - 2020.12.08 DECISION ORDER (Ward v. Jackson, Ariz. S. Ct.).pdf

 

[MonkeyF0cker]

Keep believing that fake news though, Memeboy.

[zzmocashzz]

[RaiseThese]

23k+ voted mail in even though they moved and no one with the same last name shows as living at that address........geez I wonder what happened here?

[RaiseThese]

2 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said:

[zzmocashzz]

[RaiseThese]

[RaiseThese]

I guess this is funny too

[zzmocashzz]

[rdalert447]

Jesus. Guys would rather our elections get stolen so long as “their side” benefits. They are ok with censorship so long as “their side” benefits. They’re ok with a blatantly corrupt media so long as “their side” benefits. It’s disgraceful.

[MonkeyF0cker]

1 minute ago, rdalert447 said:

Jesus. Guys would rather our elections get stolen so long as “their side” benefits. They are ok with censorship so long as “their side” benefits.” They’re ok with a blatantly corrupt media so long as “their side” benefits. It’s disgraceful.

Yup.  It's fucking sick.  These people are truly demented.

[rdalert447]

Like it can never flip in 5, 10 years. None of it should happen in America.

[RaiseThese]

[MonkeyF0cker]

4 minutes ago, rdalert447 said:

Like it can never flip in 5, 10 years. None of it should happen in America.

They don't care about America.  They're lazy, spoiled, entitled children who blame everyone else for their own problems instead of actually putting in the work to make something of their own lives.

They think everyone else owes them just because they exist.