RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 3 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said: FACTS: At no point were illegitimate ballots duplicated or inserted into the duplication process. To ensure ballots can be counted for voters that are in the military, temporarily overseas, vote using a large print or braille ballots, or who return a ballot too damaged to be read by a tabulator, Maricopa County duplicates these ballots. During the duplication process, the Elections Department assigns a matching serial number to both the original and duplicated ballot. This number can be used to compare the original ballot with the duplicated ballot. The accuracy and completeness of Maricopa County’s duplication process was confirmed in court (Ward v. Jackson) where the plaintiffs randomly sampled 1,626 of the 27,000 duplicated ballots. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling, “conclude[ing], unanimously, that . . . the challenge fails to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden Electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.” (Ariz. S. Ct., December 9, 2020) There may be some instances where the serial number was printed over the timing mark on the original damaged ballot. Since the duplicated ballot and not the original is tabulated, the added serial number overlapping a timing mark does not impact tabulation. When reviewing the randomly sampled duplicated ballots in Ward vs. Jackson, we were able to find and reconcile the serial numbers for all ballots reviewed. There he goes , what a fucking moronic sheep lol a random sample of about 6 percent is better than looking at ALL the info...... Keep on posting up bullshit pal, just make sure your heath insurance is paid up....hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Just now, RaiseThese said: There he goes , what a fucking moronic sheep lol a random sample of about 6 percent is better than looking at ALL the info...... you keep holding on to hope raise. it's all you got Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Hoffa Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Mustn't be rude Zz... This a very big day for Raise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 56 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Sloppy cheating A muther fucker would have to be in serious denial to look at this ONE piece of evidence and think shit was run on the square. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 1 minute ago, Jimmy Hoffa said: Mustn't be rude Zz... This a very big day for Raise. Its a BIG day for Truth Its a BIG day for Patriots Its a BIG day for America Even if you dont give a shit, others do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeybagadonuts Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 1 minute ago, RaiseThese said: A muther fucker would have to be in serious denial to look at this ONE piece of evidence and think shit was run on the square. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 16 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said: FACTS: At no point were illegitimate ballots duplicated or inserted into the duplication process. To ensure ballots can be counted for voters that are in the military, temporarily overseas, vote using a large print or braille ballots, or who return a ballot too damaged to be read by a tabulator, Maricopa County duplicates these ballots. During the duplication process, the Elections Department assigns a matching serial number to both the original and duplicated ballot. This number can be used to compare the original ballot with the duplicated ballot. The accuracy and completeness of Maricopa County’s duplication process was confirmed in court (Ward v. Jackson) where the plaintiffs randomly sampled 1,626 of the 27,000 duplicated ballots. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling, “conclude[ing], unanimously, that . . . the challenge fails to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden Electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.” (Ariz. S. Ct., December 9, 2020) There may be some instances where the serial number was printed over the timing mark on the original damaged ballot. Since the duplicated ballot and not the original is tabulated, the added serial number overlapping a timing mark does not impact tabulation. When reviewing the randomly sampled duplicated ballots in Ward vs. Jackson, we were able to find and reconcile the serial numbers for all ballots reviewed. So the guy with more PhD.'s from MIT than you have brain cells just completely made everything up? Is that what you're claiming? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Fuck a recount you brain dead moron...this is a FULL Gold Standard Audit I dont blame you , enjoy your time "in power", this is literally the height of D control and they have no where to go but down..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 24 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said: FACTS: At no point were illegitimate ballots duplicated or inserted into the duplication process. To ensure ballots can be counted for voters that are in the military, temporarily overseas, vote using a large print or braille ballots, or who return a ballot too damaged to be read by a tabulator, Maricopa County duplicates these ballots. During the duplication process, the Elections Department assigns a matching serial number to both the original and duplicated ballot. This number can be used to compare the original ballot with the duplicated ballot. The accuracy and completeness of Maricopa County’s duplication process was confirmed in court (Ward v. Jackson) where the plaintiffs randomly sampled 1,626 of the 27,000 duplicated ballots. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling, “conclude[ing], unanimously, that . . . the challenge fails to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden Electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.” (Ariz. S. Ct., December 9, 2020) There may be some instances where the serial number was printed over the timing mark on the original damaged ballot. Since the duplicated ballot and not the original is tabulated, the added serial number overlapping a timing mark does not impact tabulation. When reviewing the randomly sampled duplicated ballots in Ward vs. Jackson, we were able to find and reconcile the serial numbers for all ballots reviewed. That whole thing you just quoted is actually a complete lie. They used that sample to claim that the election results wouldn't have been changed by duplicate ballots alone by extrapolating the errors they DID find in the samples to the entire number of ballots. Directly from the court decision... "The first review was of 100 ballots and the second was of 1526 ballots, and of the 1626 total, there were nine errors, (1617 correct duplicate ballots) that if correct would have given the Trump Electors an additional seven votes and the Biden Electors an additional two votes. The Secretary maintains that this constitutes an error of no more than 0.37% within the sample." https://recorder.maricopa.gov/justthefacts/courtcases/7 Ward v. Jackson (AZ Supreme Court)/Ward v. Jackson APPEAL - 2020.12.08 DECISION ORDER (Ward v. Jackson, Ariz. S. Ct.).pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Keep believing that fake news though, Memeboy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 23k+ voted mail in even though they moved and no one with the same last name shows as living at that address........geez I wonder what happened here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 2 minutes ago, zzmocashzz said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 I guess this is funny too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzmocashzz Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdalert447 Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Jesus. Guys would rather our elections get stolen so long as “their side” benefits. They are ok with censorship so long as “their side” benefits. They’re ok with a blatantly corrupt media so long as “their side” benefits. It’s disgraceful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 1 minute ago, rdalert447 said: Jesus. Guys would rather our elections get stolen so long as “their side” benefits. They are ok with censorship so long as “their side” benefits.” They’re ok with a blatantly corrupt media so long as “their side” benefits. It’s disgraceful. Yup. It's fucking sick. These people are truly demented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdalert447 Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Like it can never flip in 5, 10 years. None of it should happen in America. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted September 24, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted September 24, 2021 Report Share Posted September 24, 2021 4 minutes ago, rdalert447 said: Like it can never flip in 5, 10 years. None of it should happen in America. They don't care about America. They're lazy, spoiled, entitled children who blame everyone else for their own problems instead of actually putting in the work to make something of their own lives. They think everyone else owes them just because they exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.