Jump to content

TGF Master Political Thread


KingRevolver
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • mikeman

    9229

  • Bigrunner

    6448

  • RaiseThese

    4893

  • kovacsbar

    4035

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just now, mikeman said:

You've said you're into subtlety and nuance, are you seeing anything at all that leads you to believe the election in 17 days is not going to go as you predicted?

A week ago you said some very liberal friend in PA said OZ was in rough shape, since then he's apparently rallied and taken a sizable lead - has your contact confirmed the trend?

I’ve seen some of the polling y’all have been citing. 
I haven’t contacted either of my PA pals since then, no. 
 

I acknowledge that you could be correct. My point of view is that Republicans have fumbled what should’ve been a layup. 
 

Perhaps it’s re-tightening now. Go ahead n play off my usage of “perhaps.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Machiavelli said:

Does anything under any President benefit all exactly? You asked for Americans as a whole, didn’t you? Doesn’t health care have that potential? 

Tax cuts.  Normal inflation.  Rising real wages.  Trade policies.

Umm.  Of course there are things that benefit all Americans.

Health care plans that tax more Americans and do nothing to reduce costs with less choice don't have that potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mikeman said:

What do you think of Kamalla. is she a strong and promising candidate for 24 if biden doesn't run?

No. I don’t dig her: 

My expectations is that Newsom will be the chosen guy, and he’ll cite Cali’s budget as to why he can run the country. 
 

He’ll ignore the homeless stuff n all the wokeness n the media will give him a pass. 
 

I’ve been thinking it’ll be Newsom v DeSantis. The Bill Clinton n George W Bush archetypes h2h. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Machiavelli said:

I’ve seen some of the polling y’all have been citing. 
I haven’t contacted either of my PA pals since then, no. 
 

I acknowledge that you could be correct. My point of view is that Republicans have fumbled what should’ve been a layup. 
 

Perhaps it’s re-tightening now. Go ahead n play off my usage of “perhaps.”

The fumbling you refer to is their failure to embrace semi liberal causes, was that your belief?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Machiavelli said:

No. I don’t dig her: 

My expectations is that Newsom will be the chosen guy, and he’ll cite Cali’s budget as to why he can run the country. 
 

He’ll ignore the homeless stuff n all the wokeness n the media will give him a pass. 
 

I’ve been thinking it’ll be Newsom v DeSantis. The Bill Clinton n George W Bush archetypes h2h. 

If you think De Santis is comparable to W Bush... wow

Just wow

That ain't smart comparison at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Machiavelli said:

You tell me, as I’ve already dissed Fetterman but did claim that him being a poor candidate n Dems still likely to win PA said a lot about Oz. 

Go gobble up all you can on predicit then.  Looks like a solid 7 day trend going for Fetterman right before the midterms to get a great price on him.

Same with Herschel here in GA.  Some good that made up abortion scandal did.

image.thumb.png.8755c049215f5113a1584be7b10c11d8.png

image.png.1d5540bcbba76fcb074d9a9b6cb49ae0.png

image.thumb.png.c0a5cfe9ce37237eba776c661049e1a2.png

image.png.e76d4a59928da7d118f5792ed45767ab.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said:

Tax cuts.  Normal inflation.  Rising real wages.  Trade policies.

Umm.  Of course there are things that benefit all Americans.

Health care plans that tax more Americans and do nothing to reduce costs with less choice don't have that potential.

Would you at least acknowledge that the Bernie side has a counter to all those or almost all those? 
 

You may be able to prove progressives wrong on each n every point, but the other side has their disagreements. 
 

My point stands. But where progressives go too far, when Republicans focus on what you posted, I’ll admit that they are successful. 
 

It’s just we get stuck on one side trying to do too much n one side trying to curtail everything. Whereas I think the answer needs to be somewhere in the middle where we spend/invest at opportune times n pull back on others. 
 

And people seem to be shifting to the spend side right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MonkeyF0cker said:

The brainwashed always claim that it's the right that's moving further right while they vote for an administration that parades out trannies in the Cabinet.

It is stunning - biden appoints that flaming fagg to be head of the nuclear waste administration, then you have admiral levine - another cross dresser, then he wont address any real issue but invites trans weirdo's to the white house.

After all that the Machi's of the world say republicans wont address real issues that effect normal people. :mutley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Machiavelli said:

Would you at least acknowledge that the Bernie side has a counter to all those or almost all those? 
 

You may be able to prove progressives wrong on each n every point, but the other side has their disagreements. 
 

My point stands. But where progressives go too far, when Republicans focus on what you posted, I’ll admit that they are successful. 
 

It’s just we get stuck on one side trying to do too much n one side trying to curtail everything. Whereas I think the answer needs to be somewhere in the middle where we spend/invest at opportune times n pull back on others. 
 

And people seem to be shifting to the spend side right now. 

Bernie is another not unlike yourself that has zero values.

I supported Bernie's idea of enacting tariffs against China to punish corporations for moving manufacturing overseas.

But when Trump adopted it, Bernie was one of his biggest critics.

He has zero substance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Machiavelli said:

Would you at least acknowledge that the Bernie side has a counter to all those or almost all those? 
 

You may be able to prove progressives wrong on each n every point, but the other side has their disagreements. 
 

My point stands. But where progressives go too far, when Republicans focus on what you posted, I’ll admit that they are successful. 
 

It’s just we get stuck on one side trying to do too much n one side trying to curtail everything. Whereas I think the answer needs to be somewhere in the middle where we spend/invest at opportune times n pull back on others. 
 

And people seem to be shifting to the spend side right now. 

Shit, i forgot you were a bernie guy before biden got the nomination, now you claim to be a moderate independent, this is high comedy folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikeman said:

It is stunning - biden appoints that flaming fagg to be head of the nuclear waste administration, then you have admiral levine - another cross dresser, then he wont address any real issue but invites trans weirdo's to the white house.

After all that the Machi's of the world say republicans wont address real issues that effect normal people. :mutley

It's truly staggering what brainwashing does to people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mikeman said:

The fumbling you refer to is their failure to embrace semi liberal causes, was that your belief?

To a degree. 
 

Especially strategically. Because, if there are items that are gonna pass anyway, then why make fighting them head on too major of a cause??

Accept what will be, and address larger surrounding issues if you want to create lasting change. 
 

Fair or unfair, it’s a Republican hallmark to run on issues rather than solve issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Machiavelli said:

To a degree. 
 

Especially strategically. Because, if there are items that are gonna pass anyway, then why make fighting them head on too major of a cause??

Accept what will be, and address larger surrounding issues if you want to create lasting change. 
 

Fair or unfair, it’s a Republican hallmark to run on issues rather than solve issues. 

yea, I'm sure if kari Lake got all squishy and soft - more like Liz Cheney, she'd have a better chance. :laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Machiavelli said:

To a degree. 
 

Especially strategically. Because, if there are items that are gonna pass anyway, then why make fighting them head on too major of a cause??

Accept what will be, and address larger surrounding issues if you want to create lasting change. 
 

Fair or unfair, it’s a Republican hallmark to run on issues rather than solve issues. 

In other words, abandon your values, move to the left along with the socialists, and cave to the mob to "create lasting change" that results in the destruction of the country.

LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said:

In other words, abandon your values, move to the left along with the socialists, and cave to the mob to "create lasting change" that results in the destruction of the country.

LOL.

those are called Rino's , who are hated and despised by most republicans today, great advice. :deemer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said:

In other words, abandon your values and cave to the mob to "create lasting change" that results in the destruction of the country.

LOL.

Core values are important. 
 

However, 350M people or whatever our actual population is will not have the same core. 
 

Have to adjust n adapt to meet the needs of the people n the nation as a whole and its sustainability. 
 

You go to the extreme in everything. One can keep core values while working to be effective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Machiavelli said:

Core values are important. 
 

However, 350M people or whatever our actual population is will not have the same core. 
 

Have to adjust n adapt to meet the needs of the people n the nation as a whole and its sustainability. 
 

You go to the extreme in everything. One can keep core values while working to be effective. 

If you're for small government, voting for socialized healthcare is MORE THAN CERTAINLY abandoning your core values - which is exactly what you've advocated here multiple times.

JFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Jimmy Hoffa changed the title to TGF Master Political Thread

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...