Brick Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 brewers -173 nats -145 yankees +208 indians -140 angels +107 astros -195 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 moldy, post your record and units to help him out you sheep or else they stand. tripp is the official grader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 OK moldy i see the play i missed, your stupid usa basketball exhibition 2h play where you dont even make your pick very clear (for some reason USA basketball is bolded but your pick is not?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 cheating little sheep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Cee did well today with all his Adam Scott fades, cleared over 4 units total fading that guy in golf plays Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 So you can go correlated like that shit? I can go over in a baseball game 10 times with the drop down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 If we can do that stuff going to do the same with baseball Over first 5/over 9/first inning run/h/r/er/etc Did that change last go round? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 So you can go correlated like that shit? I can go over in a baseball game 10 times with the drop down?idk nobody said anything when he made the plays You had Brantley over 2 h/r/rbi and then Brantley vs Teix yesterday also which id say are correlated not sure where we draw the line, timely said he was in control of the rules and running this shit, i just grade it. Timely also wanted no max on lines though so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 I came back in and made the play cause they said Tex was sitting and thought Brantly would have a nice night. I aint watching 8 guys plays but thats common sense You pick 20 guys against 1 in golf if the one guy does bad you clean up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 I agree thought it was strange at the time but timely said he was the rules guy and wanted control over that. Only post on the matter from before is RJT making a comment after cee made the plays but never got a response Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Well let me know cause going back to drawing board tonight if those count Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 general rule of thumb - if the book allows you to parlay it, you can play it. if the book does not allow you to parlay it, you can't play them together is how we've done it. you guys all using correlated shit because i can't monitor; jfc. GOING FORWARD, if a book doesn't allow you to parlay it then you can not play them. All plays up until today count. Cee lost 1000 units fading yesterday so whatever. ttp's brantley plays count. Ruling is final. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 I dont Try to play one thing a game. always do. Hard with batter props and first inning stuff. No chance that 8 adam scott plays can be parlayed. That is clearly wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Well let me know cause going back to drawing board tonight if those countplays you entered for today will count. frankly, i don't really care if they're correlated as you're just as likely to lose them all as you are to win them. that said, it allows someone to catch up with much more ease towards the end of the tournament so going forward, those plays will be considered invalid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 I dont Try to play one thing a game. always do. Hard with batter props and first inning stuff. No chance that 8 adam scott plays can be parlayed. That is clearly wrongI didn't think you were cheating; i have made the same mistake when thinking a batter has a good match-up. Let's just nip it in the butt going forward. I'm also confused, weren't Cee's plays with Scott for round 1? That's how I initially read them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 general rule of thumb - if the book allows you to parlay it, you can play it. if the book does not allow you to parlay it, you can't play them together is how we've done it. you guys all using correlated shit because i can't monitor; jfc. GOING FORWARD, if a book doesn't allow you to parlay it then you can not play them. All plays up until today count. Cee lost 1000 units fading yesterday so whatever. ttp's brantley plays count. Ruling is final.Good since ttp went 0-1 on those (with teix play cancelled since he didnt start) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Stenson +260 - Top 10 finishRose +175 - Top 10 finish Full TourneyBubba -140 vs Dustin JohnsonStenson -140 vs Adam ScottRose -150 vs Adam ScottFowler +105 vs Adam Scott 1st RoundKoepka +110 vs Adam ScottDay -120 vs Dustin JohnsonFowler -105 vs Dustin Johnsonedit, saw they were full tournament. Since these plays have not officially ended, Cee will be given one play of Stenson vs Scott - the other two will be void. I am using Stenson because it was the first pick posted. Clearly you can't fade one guy with 20 golfers; no book would allow that to be parlayed. Since the plays are not technically final, it would be fair to void 2 of them an keep the other two. The plays that have gone final prior to this ruling will all stand; not going to make tripp go back and double check everything after the fact. Or we can just start over so my 0-3 is wiped clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 plays you entered for today will count. frankly, i don't really care if they're correlated as you're just as likely to lose them all as you are to win them. that said, it allows someone to catch up with much more ease towards the end of the tournament so going forward, those plays will be considered invalid. That argument doesnt work in a contest though. If i can play 50 plays that all fade or follow one team or one person now all I need to do is hit one thing right and im +50 units and win the contest. Sure i could just as easily lose and be -50 but that doesnt matter. I dont lose 50 units worth of dough, it allows me to gain units much more easily than i should in a contest And FTR im not saying disallow cees plays. Nobody had a big issue yesterday when he went 1-2 with his two losses fading DJ. And not sure anyone would ahve spoke up today if he went 0-3 with his Adam Scott tourney fades. So dont think its fair to take them away but do think they shouldnt be allowed moving forward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Do you guys ever understand English? Tex was ruled out and came back and made the play Already hate the other thread with the dolts there dont turn this into that too. Ill be happy to bow out. Really no big deal for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripp Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 edit, saw they were full tournament. Since these plays have not officially ended, Cee will be given one play of Stenson vs Scott - the other two will be void. I am using Stenson because it was the first pick posted. Clearly you can't fade one guy with 20 golfers; no book would allow that to be parlayed. Since the plays are not technically final, it would be fair to void 2 of them an keep the other two. The plays that have gone final prior to this ruling will all stand; not going to make tripp go back and double check everything after the fact. Or we can just start over so my 0-3 is wiped clean. Its tough though because they really are final. Scott finished at +7 he didnt make the cut. Everyone else there is going to make the cut so they already beat Scott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Do you guys ever understand English? Tex was ruled out and came back and made the play Already hate the other thread with the dolts there dont turn this into that too. Ill be happy to bow out. Really no big deal for me Huh? I never said you did anything wrong. Just said going forward, if you can't parlay it you can't play it. No big deal. You certainly weren't the only one who did it - as I said, I think I am probably guilty in the past tournament which i Finished -16 of doing the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 That argument doesnt work in a contest though. If i can play 50 plays that all fade or follow one team or one person now all I need to do is hit one thing right and im +50 units and win the contest. Sure i could just as easily lose and be -50 but that doesnt matter. I dont lose 50 units worth of dough, it allows me to gain units much more easily than i should in a contest And FTR im not saying disallow cees plays. Nobody had a big issue yesterday when he went 1-2 with his two losses fading DJ. And not sure anyone would ahve spoke up today if he went 0-3 with his Adam Scott tourney fades. So dont think its fair to take them away but do think they shouldnt be allowed moving forward agree, because it allows you to catch up when you're way behind. I understand that which is why going forward you can not do anything you can't parlay. If you could help me monitor, as I have been really busy at work all week, it would be greatly appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 Its tough though because they really are final. Scott finished at +7 he didnt make the cut. Everyone else there is going to make the cut so they already beat ScottOne play can stay, the other two can't. That simple. If he had lost all three, I would rule the exact same way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 I have to head back to work, and won't be back until later tonight. Apologies for the misunderstanding and cluster fuck. I see no other fair way of deciding it other than voiding the open correlated plays and moving on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timetopay Posted August 14, 2015 Report Share Posted August 14, 2015 This shit little Smarj really couldnt hold them to 5 runs in 5 Jaysus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.