Jump to content

How many millions do online sportsbooks leave on the table?


Reno Marty
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 537
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

By dealing integer totals that permit pushes instead of shading by a half point? For MLB and NFL, 10% of all their total action (and possibly spread action for NFL) ends up pushing instead of them earning vig.

 

Do they really think bettors are turned off so much by having lopsided lines instead of -110/-110? In Vegas maybe, but offshore? Look at the Brewers/Mariners total right now. Over 9 -121, Under 9 +110. That could be O9.5 +105 / U 9.5 -115 which is even less lopsided. Don't tell me it's risk aversion and that they don't want to get middled. It's one fucking baseball game.

 

Didn't a Superbowl game push a few years ago? There goes how many millions in vig. 

 

When are these nitwits going to catch on?

By dealing integer totals that permit pushes instead of shading by a half point? For MLB and NFL, 10% of all their total action (and possibly spread action for NFL) ends up pushing instead of them earning vig.

 

Do they really think bettors are turned off so much by having lopsided lines instead of -110/-110? In Vegas maybe, but offshore? Look at the Brewers/Mariners total right now. Over 9 -121, Under 9 +110. That could be O9.5 +105 / U 9.5 -115 which is even less lopsided. Don't tell me it's risk aversion and that they don't want to get middled. It's one fucking baseball game.

 

Didn't a Superbowl game push a few years ago? There goes how many millions in vig. 

 

When are these nitwits going to catch on?

Those nitwits do pretty well....

 

Have you ever sat on the other side of the counter?

 

Very rare to get middles on baseball totals...

 

I understand what your point is but it is not all black and white like you think...

 

Good luck going forward...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those nitwits do pretty well....

 

Have you ever sat on the other side of the counter?

 

Very rare to get middles on baseball totals...

 

I understand what your point is but it is not all black and white like you think...

 

Good luck going forward...

 

No kidding they do well. Booking guys like Hangover is a license to print money. But they could print more. 

 

Do you mean rare that the books move their totals to allow for the possibility of them being middled, or rare that such middles could happen because games rarely land on the total? They land on the total about 12% of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totals fall all the time n NBA and foots....not so much MLB...

 

I was always told not to be afraid of numbers, just have a little respect...

 

Even if you were right, we see the same integer effect in NBA and NFL. You'd think in the NBA of all places you'd ALWAYS get a non-integer total given the half point is worth the least of all the sports, which, by the way, tells you something about how often the game lands on the total VD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to book guys like Hangover and Harvard. But, uh, I think I won't risk my very comfortable life by breaking the law. Fucking idiots... If I thought it wasn't profitable to book your bets, then I would also have to think you're beating your bookies. And I'm sure that's happening. 

 

Always Call Heads, it has nothing to do with the confidence in their numbers. What book these days even makes their own number? The Brewers/Mariners example I gave features a different total but the exact same EV (or rather -EV for the bettor). It's well documented what a half point in MLB is worth. If you don't know how to do it just look at Pinnacle's drop down menu. You think a small time shop could do worse than following Pinnacle's pricing for half points?

 

ACH... it makes little difference to me whether they follow this strategy or not. I'm taking the book's perspective. If I ran a book I would not deal integer totals, especially integer totals that already have "imbalanced odds" like the Brewers/Mariners game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to book guys like Hangover and Harvard. But, uh, I think I won't risk my very comfortable life by breaking the law. Fucking idiots... If I thought it wasn't profitable to book your bets, then I would also have to think you're beating your bookies. And I'm sure that's happening. 

 

 

lol nice cop out....guarantee you would be living in the streets with the other broke fuks in Vegas if you were to book me and Harvard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to book guys like Hangover and Harvard. But, uh, I think I won't risk my very comfortable life by breaking the law. Fucking idiots... If I thought it wasn't profitable to book your bets, then I would also have to think you're beating your bookies. And I'm sure that's happening. 

 

Always Call Heads, it has nothing to do with the confidence in their numbers. What book these days even makes their own number? The Brewers/Mariners example I gave features a different total but the exact same EV (or rather -EV for the bettor). It's well documented what a half point in MLB is worth. If you don't know how to do it just look at Pinnacle's drop down menu. You think a small time shop could do worse than following Pinnacle's pricing for half points?

 

ACH... it makes little difference to me whether they follow this strategy or not. I'm taking the book's perspective. If I ran a book I would not deal integer totals, especially integer totals that already have "imbalanced odds" like the Brewers/Mariners game.

I think the books know that they are on the wrong side of the computer power. They can only react. You say the squares outnumber the sharps but that is not the case money wise. They are clearly worried about you computer boys slamming them when they get any number off. They don't want to take the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the books know that they are on the wrong side of the computer power. They can only react. You say the squares outnumber the sharps but that is not the case money wise. They are clearly worried about you computer boys slamming them when they get any number off. They don't want to take the risk.

 

If they're this dumb, then that explains why they are scared to go off integers. You could be right. But they're morons. Not surprising though -- yet to meet an intelligent bookmaker in my life. Enjoy it that way.

 

Alex C at BetOnline was the only one I met who had a clue. Wonder what rogue country he's in these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're this dumb, then that explains why they are scared to go off integers. You could be right. But they're morons. Not surprising though -- yet to meet an intelligent bookmaker in my life. Enjoy it that way.

 

Alex C at BetOnline was the only one I met who had a clue. Wonder what rogue country he's in these days.

I think we are only basically talking about Bookmaker. Every other books worries about how fast they move their line after Bookmaker. Bookmaker does not want to put out any numbers for you and durito and your kind to slam. They don't pay enough to go up against the computer army.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol nice cop out....guarantee you would be living in the streets with the other broke fuks in Vegas if you were to book me and Harvard

 

Says the guy who doesn't care about half points because when he's caped a game to go over it goes over. Yeah you'd be a tough guy to book. All I'd have to do is shade the total 2 half points at 40c each, getting you serious "plus money" and have you double down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...