Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 That's not the conversation.Answer the ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Not answering the question because it doesn't apply to anything actually being proposed or discussed. See straw man fallacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 And FTR, M-16's are legal to own by Class III licensees. But you know firearms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ted sheckler Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Far from stock. Bought new, before ever driven had new motor put in. thumbs up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downsouth Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I own various handguns. Nothing large or major but I am starting to come around o n. need for tighter controls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ted sheckler Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Should just ban all magazines over 10rds.handguns and rifles. Problem solved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVU Posted February 21, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I own various handguns. Nothing large or major but I am starting to come around o n. need for tighter controls.good for you (and us) my man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Should just ban all magazines over 10rds.handguns and rifles. Problem solved? That's already been tried in California and overturned in Federal court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 And FTR, M-16's are legal to own by Class III licensees. But you know firearms.Which you do not possess so back to the original question do you think you should have the right to purchase an M16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Should just ban all magazines over 10rds.handguns and rifles. Problem solved?Too easy for the black market to produce magazines holding more than 10 rounds plus most AR owners now I'm guessing already own multiple clips for gun as an example I think I have probably 10 to 12 myself AR that I own I would assume most other people are the same way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ted sheckler Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 That's already been tried in California and overturned in Federal court. I thought it was still a thing in CA. I thought you can't buy over 10 now...Only grandfathered in ones allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Which you do not possess so back to the original question do you think you should have the right to purchase an M16 You're really desperate. Huh? Again, that has nothing to do with what is being proposed. So, why are you now trying to argue about something completely different? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I thought it was still a thing in CA. I thought you can't buy over 10 now...Only grandfathered in ones allowed. Yeah. I guess it was recently upheld on appeal on 2/8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Until one of you can tell me how any of the proposed restrictions would have prevented Columbine, you really don't have an argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 This shooter killed 17 people, how many less would he have killed with a handgun, I dont think there would be any less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Until one of you can tell me how any of the proposed restrictions would have prevented Columbine, you really don't have an argument.And we shold keep abortion legal just incase we have a bi-racial fetus that is the product of incest, has downs, and the mom used herion. Brilliant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 This shooter killed 17 people, how many less would he have killed with a handgun, I dont think there would be any less.I take it you don't shoot much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 And we shold keep abortion legal just incase we have a bi-racial fetus that is the product of incest, has downs, and the mom used herion. Brilliant Yes. Abortion should be legal. But again, more straw man bullshit because you can't refute that Columbine wouldn't have been prevented by any of the other bullshit you're spewing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 There is not a single thing you've said that would prevent another Columbine. And all of these incidents are essentially copycats of that tragedy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I take it you don't shoot much?I used to carry a gun, I was an excellent shot. What's your point, a person with a handgun, or two, (and extra clips) could easily have killed just as many as Cruz did with his rifle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I used to carry a gun, I was an excellent shot. What's your point, a person with a handgun, or two, (and extra clips) could easily have killed just as many as Cruz did with his rifle.I doubt the kid could hit a running person at 20 feet with a pistol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The X Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I used to be an avid hunter and still own a few guns. Never hunted with an AR15 because there's absolutely no need for it. These guns are only good for two things. Damage and death. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I used to be an avid hunter and still own a few guns. Never hunted with an AR15 because there's absolutely no need for it. These guns are only good for two things. Damage and death.3 making your weiny hard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatboatboat Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 this was shot with a AR .223 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eplhNDRG7pA[/video] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I doubt the kid could hit a running person at 20 feet with a pistolYou think it takes a great deal of accuracy to shoot fish in a barrel? A .45 will also do much more damage than a .223 round in that situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.