Jump to content

Nevada sportsbooks have record September


MonkeyF0cker
 Share

Recommended Posts

taxes almost NEVER come down, they only go up

 

feds could get their hands on some of the revenue, sports leagues could get their hands on it, etc etc

They did not even complain about the Pennsylvania taxes. The NBA did while also claiming they did not want gambling legalized which was hilarious. They have zero concern about tax rates because they know they are going to win that battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The potential is that MGM or another book can set up shop in every state and book all the action. If you go into every state at low cost online then offshore is challenged and you successfully bring offshore money to the US gambling market.

Gaming boom in the U.S. will only aid offshore credit business, any agent worth his salt will have feelers all over. A win win for both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

taxes almost NEVER come down, they only go up

 

feds could get their hands on some of the revenue, sports leagues could get their hands on it, etc etc

This is going to be another interesting thing to watch because it seems way too high. But if NJ can tax at that rate, everybody else is going to as well. Because as I have told Monkey and he does not like, they are all going to follow NJ. If it turns out you can tax higher, they are going to tax higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The barrier of entry isn't the taxes.  It's the licensing, fees, and bond.

 

There are nearly as many independent sportsbook enterprises in New Jersey as there are in Las Vegas already and if nobody needs to go to a casino to fund their account, it's MUCH easier to create an account and wager compared to Nevada.

 

it's all of the above

 

let's say new jersey eventually does $1 billion in sports wagers and someone like mgm can get 10% of that action... i think they are just as concerned by the $1 million in annual taxes they would pay as the license (highest license amount i have heard of in any state is $10 million one-time fee).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's all of the above

 

let's say new jersey eventually does $1 billion in sports wagers and someone like mgm can get 10% of that action... i think they are just as concerned by the $1 million in annual taxes they would pay as the license (highest license amount i have heard of in any state is $10 million one-time fee).

 

They can't be taxed on revenue though.  They'd all be losing money.  It has to be on profit/hold.  So the taxes are a good problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. I would not be that optimistic about agents. If the US gambling market supplies what people want, they are not going to go looking to get stiffed.

Getting paid in cash weekly with no income reporting can be very persuasive. The brick and mortars will have bartenders doing a lot of double duty serve a drink and prod for info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't be taxed on revenue though.  They'd all be losing money.  It has to be on profit/hold.  So the taxes are a good problem...

 

but the profit/hold isn't the bottom line, it's just the net profit BEFORE ALL OTHER EXPENSES (wages/interest/rent/management fees/etc etc etc)

 

hold on $100 million is $5 million... there is a big difference between investing in a venture that is going to net $5 million after taxes (but before 3 million of other expenses) and one that is gonna net $2 million after taxes (but before 3 million of other expenses that now push it into a loss)

 

between fed/state/possible league fee/etc the taxes could easily be a ridiculous number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting paid in cash weekly with no income reporting can be very persuasive. The brick and mortars will have bartenders doing a lot of double duty serve a drink and prod for info.

They should do a lot more business because more people are going to be gambling. Not sure how many are going to do it with a bookie. I definitely wouldn't. The foundation of bookies is that gambling is illegal. Once it is legal, you don't need a bookie anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but the profit/hold isn't the bottom line, it's just the net profit BEFORE ALL OTHER EXPENSES (wages/interest/rent/management fees/etc etc etc)

 

hold on $100 million is $5 million... there is a big difference between investing in a venture that is going to net $5 million after taxes (but before 3 million of other expenses) and one that is gonna net $2 million after taxes (but before 3 million of other expenses that now push it into a loss)

 

between fed/state/possible league fee/etc the taxes could easily be a ridiculous number

 

For sure.  There's obviously a minimum amount of volume necessary to break even in either case.  But getting a casino license without having a casino has to be a much a bigger problem for those hoping to enter the market.  If you have to build a casino first or acquire a casino/license holder as you would have to in Nevada, that cost is astronomical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MGM is using Ladbrokes for their non-nevada betting.  I don't know how that's going to work, but if ladbrokes is running it it will be a 100% opposite how the book in LV.

This is a pretty good indication of how interested MGM is in future online sportsbetting and why the Vegas casinos will probably not be a major player long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure.  There's obviously a minimum amount of volume necessary to break even in either case.  But getting a casino license without having a casino has to be a much a bigger problem for those hoping to enter the market.  If you have to build a casino first or acquire a casino/license holder as you would have to in Nevada, that cost is astronomical.

 

yeah good point, i was thinking of guys already having existing casinos but that won't usually be the case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a pretty good indication of how interested MGM is in future online sportsbetting and why the Vegas casinos will probably not be a major player long term.

 

I love how you think that's 100% when the person saying it explicitly said he isn't even sure how it's going to work.

 

I will find out more info directly from the source on that soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how you think that's 100% when the person saying it explicitly said he isn't even sure how it's going to work.

 

I will find out more info directly from the source on that soon.

All that matters is they contracted out. They are  going to play from behind. DraftKings is going to get online and kick their ass if they do it right. DraftKings is off and running. If they start expanding to other states first, they will never catch them. 

 

The Vegas casinos do not want to play the game. They just want to show up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that matters is they contracted out. They are  going to play from behind. DraftKings is going to get online and kick their ass if they do it right. DraftKings is off and running. If they start expanding to other states first, they will never catch them. 

 

The Vegas casinos do not want to play the game. They just want to show up.

 

Clueless.

 

You don't partner with someone with the intent of being passive in the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All that matters is they contracted out. They are  going to play from behind. DraftKings is going to get online and kick their ass if they do it right. DraftKings is off and running. If they start expanding to other states first, they will never catch them. 

 

The Vegas casinos do not want to play the game. They just want to show up.

 

Draft kings will be busto in another year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have no fucking idea what they're doing.  None.

 

Just shut up already.

Actually, I have a pretty good idea what both are doing. I'm pretty impressed by DraftKings here. They have no business even running a sportsbook and they are getting all the attention that I have seen. They aren't play for keeps with their operation but that is probably smart right now. They are definitely in position to score big and seem to be planning on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how you think that's 100% when the person saying it explicitly said he isn't even sure how it's going to work.

 

I will find out more info directly from the source on that soon.

 

Anyone know what the MGM limits are on the app in NJ?   That alone would probably tell you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I have a pretty good idea what both are doing. I'm pretty impressed by DraftKings here. They have no business even running a sportsbook and they are getting all the attention that I have seen. They aren't play for keeps with their operation but that is probably smart right now. They are definitely in position to score big and seem to be planning on it.

John Avello and Mark Dufty hired...…….recent managers of Wynn and Jerry's Nugget here in Vegas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...