Jump to content

Bernie soon to announce. Who here picks him?


Machiavelli
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 298
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bernie has little shot because he's way, way too old, and this year there are multiple candidates that fill Bernie's progressive slot and are much more attractive candidates(Lizzie, Tulsi, Sherrod Brown if he gets in), and those that aren't long term progressives and/or Bernie 2016 supporters will embrace that wing, as 15461891c60a067c3f4f9c5d6422d6b3--wrestl already is.   I hate to be an ageist, but someone as old as Bernie, or Biden, should not be running for POTUS.    We have a minimum age of 35, perhaps we should have a maximum age of 75 or so.  

Bernie's time and energy would be better spent getting behind one of the other candidates early.   Unfortunately, like many others, his ego will cause him to run.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the most powerful D’s savataged him last time, why would they embrace him this time?

Howard Schultz is making Bernie attractive, as while The Establishment is anointing Kamala Harris as HRC 2.0, Bernie will be seen as the option that makes sure Schultz cannot play spoiler.

 

Bernie 2020 keeps getting closer to reality..... If you can see the signs like I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howard Schultz is making Bernie attractive, as while The Establishment is anointing Kamala Harris as HRC 2.0, Bernie will be seen as the option that makes sure Schultz cannot play spoiler.

 

Bernie 2020 keeps getting closer to reality..... If you can see the signs like I can.

Are you trolling Machi? Or are you really into this pre election, pre primary crap? :scratch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn’t matter how you slice it, taxing successful people to transfer it to unsuccessful people is bad for everyone involved.

 

I agree with you about the 1%. But that has a lot more to do with corruption than taxation.

 

BAUS

From Republicans Eisenhower to Nixon a 70% tax was endorsed. America was built because of this tax. Then Reagan slashed this tax in half. The rest is history. The Billionaires are taking all the money in America. The gap in wealth between the rich and the rest has never been greater. The top 1% richest Americans have more wealth than 90%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do the Dems hate babies?

The Dems pass laws guaranteeing free healthcare for babies. Republicons pass laws separating babies from their mothers, putting the babies in cages, drugging the babies, and allowing them to die while in custody of Republicons.

 

BTW the Central Park 5 were proven innocent? Correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Dems pass laws guaranteeing free healthcare for babies. Republicons pass laws separating babies from their mothers, putting the babies in cages, drugging the babies, and allowing them to die while in custody of Republicons.

 

BTW the Central Park 5 were proven innocent? Correct?

You are one screwed up individual!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Runny, why is socialism good?

From Eisenhower to Nixon the 70% tax was endorsed. America was built with the 70% tax. Even before Eisenhower, FDR implemented the greatest social program in modern history. The New Deal, which has been overwhelming successful.

 

Balco, why should Billionaires get all the money and control the lawmakers. They're a minority and should not dictate policy. That's not a democracy it's an Oligarchy. Next

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...