Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, MonkeyF0cker said: You're stuck thinking that it's an issue of Democrats vs. Republicans and not corruption vs. justice. Welcome to 2016. 2016 is where you are and where I was before. I’ve moved on from that because while I agree about corruption v Justice, the bigger issue is about resources. And if the Republicans are going to be selfish/stingy and not help people, then Dems are gonna win by default and allowed to go too psycho. But people like you let the Republicans play them by focusing on stuff that while important, isn’t the most important. Because sure, it’s great if we can stamp out corruption entirely, but not if we go back to the other side being more corrupt n still not doing enough for people. Play to win; then play to change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, KingRevolver said: Would love to bang Hobbs. Sweet moses! Seems to be about the extent of your political scrutiny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, Machiavelli said: 2016 is where you are and where I was before. I’ve moved on from that because while I agree about corruption v Justice, the bigger issue is about resources. And if the Republicans are going to be selfish/stingy and not help people, then Dems are gonna win by default and allowed to go too psycho. But people like you let the Republicans play them by focusing on stuff that while important, isn’t the most important. Because sure, it’s great if we can stamp out corruption entirely, but not if we go back to the other side being more corrupt n still not doing enough for people. Play to win; then play to change. And that just proves how much of a libtard you really are while trying to claim that you're independent. Helping people isn't handing people money. Tough love is necessary today more than ever for a bunch of lazy and entitled dipshit Americans who take no responsibility for themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 3 minutes ago, El Chapo2017 said: Lmao! Anybody posting anything by Josh Hawley, who expects to be taken seriously, is a Stupid Motherfukker... If the shoe fits, etc... Hawley had a strong future. That thumbs up on J6 ruined it. Plus, like all these other firm right people, he uses his sharpness to stay firmly right and cheerlead the echo chamber. Which doesn’t help most people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Nobody centrist is voting for the extreme socialist policies of this administration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: And that just proves how much of a libtard you really are while trying to claim that you're independent. Helping people isn't handing people money. Tough love is necessary today more than ever for a bunch of lazy and entitled dipshit Americans who take no responsibility for themselves. Where did I state just handing people money? There are a ton of ways to help, and your extremeness is emblematic of the firm right and and why the left gets to win by default, go a bit psycho n write the rules. But you’d rather lose on principle then win n change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 5 minutes ago, El Chapo2017 said: Lmao! Anybody posting anything by Josh Hawley, who expects to be taken seriously, is a Stupid Motherfukker... If the shoe fits, etc... Of course, you're so stupid you don't even know that the posted Tweet was from Glenn Greenwald - the reporter who was with Edward Snowden in Hong Kong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Nobody centrist is voting for the extreme socialist policies of this administration. Biden has shifted more center from year 2 onward. Pay attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, Machiavelli said: Where did I state just handing people money? There are a ton of ways to help, and your extremeness is emblematic of the firm right and and why the left gets to win by default, go a bit psycho n write the rules. But you’d rather lose on principle then win n change. What "help" are you referring to that doesn't involve just handing people money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, Machiavelli said: Biden has shifted more center from year 2 onward. Pay attention. Uh huh. Keep trying to justify your libtarded mistake. There are trannies parading around in the White House acting like they're qualified to be there. Well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, MonkeyF0cker said: What "help" are you referring to that doesn't involve just handing people money? Health care for one. But creating more jobs programs, or even tightening up welfare/food stamp systems that require more job training and such. A million ways to influence current programs in a more conservative fashion while still showing compassion. Bush’s “Compassionate Conservatism” was an excellent platform for conservatives to hold power while still helping people. You think anything remotely “socialist” means everyone advocates for the extremity of such, but I strongly disagree and see it as American to uplift our people as we can. And when conservatives lead the way responsibly, then we can have a strong nation and uplifted people. Why should it be one or the other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 4 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Uh huh. Keep trying to justify your libtarded mistake. There are trannies parading around in the White House acting like they're qualified to be there. Well done. Lol I’m glad that dude was fired and am on the conservative side of Sex v Gender. I hope they win out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 3 minutes ago, Machiavelli said: Lol I’m glad that dude was fired and am on the conservative side of Sex v Gender. I hope they win out there. Umm. There was more than one tranny in the White House. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 5 minutes ago, Machiavelli said: Health care for one. But creating more jobs programs, or even tightening up welfare/food stamp systems that require more job training and such. A million ways to influence current programs in a more conservative fashion while still showing compassion. Bush’s “Compassionate Conservatism” was an excellent platform for conservatives to hold power while still helping people. You think anything remotely “socialist” means everyone advocates for the extremity of such, but I strongly disagree and see it as American to uplift our people as we can. And when conservatives lead the way responsibly, then we can have a strong nation and uplifted people. Why should it be one or the other? Because we ever get less socialist. Right? If you actually think subsidizing unhealthy and poor people's health care isn't giving money away while doing absolutely nothing to solve the inherent costs of healthcare, you really don't have a clue. George W Bush was the worst President of my lifetime before Joe Biden. Go figure you like both of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Umm. There was more than one tranny in the White House. Yes, but I’m glad the one was fired. If the other does their job correctly, then that’s all that matters. I can still be Sex > Gender n want someone to succeed in their role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, MonkeyF0cker said: Because we ever get less socialist. Right? If you actually think subsidizing unhealthy and poor people's health care isn't giving money away while doing absolutely nothing to solve the inherent costs of healthcare, you really don't have a clue. George W Bush was the worst President of my lifetime before Joe Biden. Go figure you like both of them. You’ve been sold a Bill of Goods that MAGA is a pure agenda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRevolver Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 3 minutes ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Umm. There was more than one tranny in the White House. WTF? How many times were you there, pal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, Machiavelli said: Yes, but I’m glad the one was fired. If the other does their job correctly, then that’s all that matters. I can still be Sex > Gender n want someone to succeed in their role. So you think they were actually hired because they were the most qualified candidates? LOL. That's what you voted for. Own it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 2 minutes ago, Machiavelli said: You’ve been sold a Bill of Goods that MAGA is a pure agenda. Huh? Umm. I'm a libertarian. Neat deflection though. That's all you libtards have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdalert447 Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, KingRevolver said: WTF? How many times were you there, pal? Lollll. Pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, KingRevolver said: WTF? How many times were you there, pal? Less than the number of times you've jerked off to their pictures, surely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, MonkeyF0cker said: So you think they were actually hired because they were the most qualified candidates? LOL. That's what you voted for. Own it. I voted for Biden because Trump failed to earn a 2nd vote of mine. I don’t have to agree with everything he does or who he hires. But his overall vision to lead out of the pandemic is better than where we’d be under Trump. Just need to be patient as all this new stuff gets going. He had quite a mess to clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdalert447 Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Huh? Umm. I'm a libertarian. If you disagree with Libs, you are automatically Republican MAGA. Didn’t you know this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, MonkeyF0cker said: Huh? Umm. I'm a libertarian. Neat deflection though. That's all you libtards have. Uh, I’m an American. Not a “libtard.” And you yourself have basically called MAGA pure when you vigorously defended Trump v the establishmentX So… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiavelli Posted December 20, 2022 Report Share Posted December 20, 2022 Just now, rdalert447 said: If you disagree with Libs, you are automatically Republican MAGA. Didn’t you know this? Nope. His own words from before did that: But do you not see him calling me a libtard at every Chance despite my mixed voting history? Oh wait, context isn’t for y’all.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.