Cop Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 I'm willing to bet this turns out to be true. It usually does. Maybe not Obama ordering it but I'm willing to bet Trump tower was wire tapped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Timely who do you think was behind the leak of Flynn' s phone conversation? You think they tapped his calls to foreign officials but didn't tap Trumps?Pal, all foreign diplomats correspondences in this country are monitored. This isn't a secret to anyone; which is why Flynn is a dope. So yes, I think the Russian ambassador has been listened in on, but no Trump was not. This is not even a story; it is speculation by a talk show radio host. You can't be serious right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 I think it's a given bias exist in all walks of lifeWell judges grant taps based on evidence, not biases, regardless of whatever nonsense you want to believe. You can speculate all the BS you want, but there is no evidence to support the claim and it's incredibly difficult to show a burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt to tap and spy on a Presidential Candidate as the candidate is protected more than an average citizen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 I'm willing to bet this turns out to be true. It usually does. Maybe not Obama ordering it but I'm willing to bet Trump tower was wire tapped.How much do you want to bet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 If phones were tapped, there was a warrant, find the warrant, you have the proof, from what I'm hearing from my highly places sources, the phone was not trumps phone, but others in trump tower. the links between the obama administration, the FBI, and likely the media will be easy to establish, allowing Trump to shut down all of them. The prisons will begin filling! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 How much do you want to bet? Still think sessions will step down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Still think sessions will step down?No, but who knows the more this idiot keeps talking. I already admitted in that thread merely minutes after I placed that bet that I was probably a dog and wrong in that wager. This wager cop is proposing it's -100000 that I'm correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 No, but who knows the more this idiot keeps talking. I already admitted in that thread merely minutes after I placed that bet that I was probably a dog and wrong in that wager. This wager cop is proposing it's -100000 that I'm correct.You dont think the obama administration would use the easily obtainable fisa warrants to do dirty tricks? You really dont, no doubt it will be hard to link them directly, but if the warrant is there, the proof is there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Just look at all the dirty tricks the clinton campaign did on poor bernie sanders and your doubt will be removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 You dont think the obama administration would use the easily obtainable fisa warrants to do dirty tricks? You really dont, no doubt it will be hard to link them directly, but if the warrant is there, the proof is there.You literally have no clue what you're talking about and don't understand the basic legal process of this country. The President of the US cannot issue or grant a wire tap of anyone in the country. If a wire was granted, it would be granted by a federal judge, not the President. The Justice Department would be the ones submitting the evidence - once again, not the President - in hopes of being granted said warrant. The speculated warrant, being "reported," admittedly never covered President Trump; if it covered anyone, it would have covered aides suspected of having Russian ties. In order to spy on said aides, the evidence needed to be quite sufficient. Once again, Trump never tapped or covered under any of this speculated nonsense. Nothing illegal took place, even if everything "reported" in the Breitbart "article" was true. Glad I could clear that up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr vegas Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 I grab their pussies. One of the benefits of owning a teen beauty pageant is I can enter the dressing room of the teen contestants at any time. The perks are unbelievable. That's enough burden of proof. Potus doesn't deserve to be safe. Shame on America!ok dummy, you post the same shit 3 times already........jez what a moron..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 You literally have no clue what you're talking about and don't understand the basic legal process of this country. The President of the US cannot issue or grant a wire tap of anyone in the country. If a wire was granted, it would be granted by a federal judge, not the President. The Justice Department would be the ones submitting the evidence - once again, not the President - in hopes of being granted said warrant. The speculated warrant, being "reported," admittedly never covered President Trump; if it covered anyone, it would have covered aides suspected of having Russian ties. In order to spy on said aides, the evidence needed to be quite sufficient. Once again, Trump never tapped or covered under any of this speculated nonsense. Nothing illegal took place, even if everything "reported" in the Breitbart "article" was true. Glad I could clear that up.Yea, the lynch justice dept, they can and did do whatever they wanted, surely you can admit that, supposedly those warrants are almost never denied, meaning all you have to do is make some flimsy charge and boom, there you go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Yea, the lynch justice dept, they can and did do whatever they wanted, surely you can admit that, supposedly those warrants are almost never denied, meaning all you have to do is make some flimsy charge and boom, there you go.Well once again you are using words like "supposedly" and non-supported claims to support your side. I'm simply posting the process that is required to be issued a warrant in this case. Obama has nothing to do with the process, and Obama can not grant the Justice Department permission to tap anyone's phones. Now that you have admitted that what Trump tweeted is wrong, and makes no sense based on the judicial process of this country, we can move on to things that are actually true maybe? Obama tapped no ones phones. He didn't order any phones to be tapped. He's not even capable of doing that. A tapping of Trump's phone was never even requested. This tweet is so stupid it makes my head spin "I'd bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr vegas Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 You literally have no clue what you're talking about and don't understand the basic legal process of this country. The President of the US cannot issue or grant a wire tap of anyone in the country. If a wire was granted, it would be granted by a federal judge, not the President. The Justice Department would be the ones submitting the evidence - once again, not the President - in hopes of being granted said warrant. The speculated warrant, being "reported," admittedly never covered President Trump; if it covered anyone, it would have covered aides suspected of having Russian ties. In order to spy on said aides, the evidence needed to be quite sufficient. Once again, Trump never tapped or covered under any of this speculated nonsense. Nothing illegal took place, even if everything "reported" in the Breitbart "article" was true. Glad I could clear that up.if this is true, you have to be naive to think they HAD to have a warrant.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 if this is true, you have to be naive to think they HAD to have a warrant..LOL the Breitbart story the POTUS is citing (makes me cringe just writing that) states at the end that they were "granted authorization" which means a warrant. So not even the conspiracy laced story denies the legality and warrant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Well once again you are using words like "supposedly" and non-supported claims to support your side. I'm simply posting the process that is required to be issued a warrant in this case. Obama has nothing to do with the process, and Obama can not grant the Justice Department permission to tap anyone's phones. Now that you have admitted that what Trump tweeted is wrong, and makes no sense based on the judicial process of this country, we can move on to things that are actually true maybe? Obama tapped no ones phones. He didn't order any phones to be tapped. He's not even capable of doing that. A tapping of Trump's phone was never even requested. This tweet is so stupid it makes my head spin "I'd bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!"I used the term supposedly because i have no knowledge of actual approval %'s other than what's reported in the media, nor do you. Have no doubts, obama will be the one to face justice, they dont need much proof, , trumps tweets take precedence in american courts. The evidence IS the tweet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr vegas Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 LOL the Breitbart story the POTUS is citing (makes me cringe just writing that) states at the end that they were "granted authorization" which means a warrant. So not even the conspiracy laced story denies the legality and warrant.so you are saying the government has never skirted the law and always follows the laws of the land... ok ,,lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Man Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Pretty smart of trump to change the subject from the fake news of his administrations ties to the russians, to obama's corrupt administration, dont you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Man Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Obama was fukking both Melania and Ivanka for the last three months of the campaign. Michele occasionally joined in when opportunity presented. The trysts occurred at Trump Plaza Baltimore where the President would sneak in the staff entrance in full room service uniform. Sources, who wish to remain anonymous quote Melania as "being impressed by the pole on the little guy", while Ivanka was said to be happy with anything other than "that funny little thing I used to get." Our domestic affairs department is working to clarify. More to follow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCD Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 You're on for $100, that's the money timely will owe me when sessions doesn't resign, I say not only is obama in jail, but he will have been executed by easter.Okay. I'll give you a pass on Obama executed by Easter. But I got $100 on Trump being indicted first.You have $100 on Obama being indicted first. Good luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Obama was fukking both Melania and Ivanka for the last three months of the campaign. Michele occasionally joined in when opportunity presented. The trysts occurred at Trump Plaza Baltimore where the President would sneak in the staff entrance in full room service uniform. Sources, who wish to remain anonymous quote Melania as "being impressed by the pole on the little guy", while Ivanka was said to be happy with anything other than "that funny little thing I used to get." Our domestic affairs department is working to clarify. More to follow.Obama was called "back seat barry" in chicago for a reason...and it had nothing to do with women. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Okay. I'll give you a pass on Obama executed by Easter. But I got $100 on Trump being indicted first.You have $100 on Obama being indicted first. Good luck!Sounds good, Timely has my money if i lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Obama's speech writer Jon Favreau ✔ @jonfavsI'd be careful about reporting that Obama said there was no wiretapping. Statement just said that neither he nor the WH ordered it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Man Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 What a fukkin joke this presidency is. Get to fukkin work for cripes sake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.