El Chapo2017 Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 13 minutes ago, xyz said: El Cucko STIFF. Edit your shit, find an original post in that cavernous skull of yours. That is the 104th time today you have posted immediately after Raiser. Posting your same RINSE. REPEAT. TROLL Horseshit. Fukk off, you tired bitch... Listen CLOSE... Don't make me say this more than once... Get this through your Ignorant Shit-Brained SKULL... In other words: Pay attention, you Mindless Piece of Shit... Here Goes... WHEN, RT Stops Posting His Ignorant Parroted Mouthshits... THEN, you can expect Me To Stop... As long as that Trump-Mouthshit-Spewing POS keeps posting--SO WILL I Got it, Bitch? Now, stay the fukk out of my threads and go sukk dikk and eat ass at the Kiddie's Table... Thx in advance... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHHEAD Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 18 minutes ago, Jimmy Hoffa said: Hay bales up to $4 each at the feed store!! DOG FOOD going through the WOOF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Chapo2017 Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 1 minute ago, FISHHEAD said: DOG FOOD going through the WOOF Cat Litter Skyrocketing... High Maintenance for Pussy... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, El Chapo2017 said: Cat Litter Skyrocketing... High Maintenance for Pussy... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Chapo2017 Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 51 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Do you LIBS think this is a good idea? Using infrared rays in order to identify you by you HEARTBEAT (short 6min vid) Do you even understand the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum agendas? You dont have to take Raise's word for it , take THEIRS as they tell you what they are planning to do. https://banned.video/watch?id=611d59ca8473755afd296fea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Two fucks that need to handled....Why Milley so racist and speaking for scamming nig nog . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Chapo2017 Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 22 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Do you LIBS think this is a good idea? Using infrared rays in order to identify you by you HEARTBEAT (short 6min vid) Do you even understand the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum agendas? You dont have to take Raise's word for it , take THEIRS as they tell you what they are planning to do. https://banned.video/watch?id=611d59ca8473755afd296fea Banned Video... Get a Life you Brainless Tinfoil Hat Parrot... You be inda Matrix, Yo... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Chapo2017 Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 26 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Do you LIBS think this is a good idea? Using infrared rays in order to identify you by you HEARTBEAT (short 6min vid) Do you even understand the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum agendas? You dont have to take Raise's word for it , take THEIRS as they tell you what they are planning to do. https://banned.video/watch?id=611d59ca8473755afd296fea Old News... From 2019... https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/27/238884/the-pentagon-has-a-laser-that-can-identify-people-from-a-distanceby-their-heartbeat/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 7 hours ago, RaiseThese said: Two fucks that need to handled....Why Milley so racist and speaking for scamming nig nog . He's an affirmative action hire, he needs help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Chapo2017 Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 3 minutes ago, RaiseThese said: Event - Some Idiot on the Internet is making up storirs and shitting them down the throats of RW Mouthshit Parrots Reaction - Mindless POS (RT) has to come here (as usual) and fukk up the forum by Parroting these Brainless Mouthshits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 The party of pedos , deviants and freaks strike again Former Democratic Party Chair Admits To Raping A Child — Pleads Guilty To Sex Crimes https://en-volve.com/2021/08/19/former-democratic-party-chair-admits-to-raping-a-child-pleads-guilty-to-sex-crimes/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redstripe Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Only 7 months in. I say he is the worst I know of. What will this country look like in 3 more years. ? At the rate we are going it does not look promising Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiseThese Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 The sad thing is he's not even in charge. people are falling from airplanes and he really said things couldn't have gone better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 History will mark Aug. 15, 2021, as the date that the Afghan government collapsed and the Taliban retook control over this troubled and war-torn country. But the real date that the Taliban's victory was assured is Feb. 29, 2020, the day the Trump administration signed what it characterized as a "peace" deal with the Taliban. Once this agreement was signed - the tragic collapse we witnessed this weekend was inevitable. Of course, the agreement was not, and could not possibly have been, a "peace" deal since one of the parties currently at war - the Afghan government - was not a signatory. Rather, this was a "withdrawal" agreement between the U.S. and the Taliban that set the terms for the complete departure of American troops from Afghanistan by May 2021. What did the United States gain in exchange for this withdrawal, for which the Taliban had been fighting for 20 years? Nothing but vague, unenforceable promises that the Taliban would not engage in hostilities against the departing U.S. troops and would "send a clear message" to al Qaeda that it "had no place" in Afghanistan. So eager Trump was to withdraw, we did not even hold out for a clear, firm commitment that the Taliban would not provide aid, safe harbor or weaponry to al Qaeda and like-minded groups. The agreement contained no enforcement mechanisms and included no penalties on the Taliban for failing to comply with its terms. Once the agreement was signed, the fate of the Afghan government was signed, sealed and delivered - the Taliban had practically won the war. There was no way that the government could possibly survive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 The fact that the United States entered into negotiations and then an agreement with the Taliban, without even inviting the Afghan government to the table, undercut the power and legitimacy of the government. The citizenry, including those in the national armed services and police, could plainly see that its own government was being ignored, a helpless bystander in critical discussions about the country's future. After we had cut the legs out from under this government and rendered it a paper tiger, it is no wonder that when those serving in the Afghan army and police were asked to fight, most said, "No, thanks." The agreement also did absolutely nothing to attempt to bring about a peaceful settlement of the war between the Afghan government and the Taliban. A genuine peace deal would have made our withdrawal contingent on the progress of peace negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban. But it did not. Trump agreed unconditionally to bring down U.S. troop levels to 8,600 by mid-July 2020 and totally withdraw by May 2021. The agreement anticipated there would be peace negotiations, but in August, Trump voluntarily cut troop levels down to 4,500, even more quickly than required by the agreement, even though negotiations had not even begun. This was a clear signal there would be no linkage between withdrawals and peace, contrary to what U.S. diplomats were telling the parties. This signal was received loud and clear by the Taliban. They balked at starting negotiations until December, and even then, had zero incentive to make any concessions since Trump had already announced that there would be only 2,500 troops in Afghanistan by the time he left office, the smallest U.S. force in 20 years. It was clear to the Taliban that the Americans were quickly headed for the exits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 When the fighting season began again this year, the only hope for the Afghan government was to show that it could stand up to the Taliban even with reduced American support to gain leverage at the bargaining table. But results on the ground were just the opposite. The Taliban gobbled up territory more quickly than it had in years. As the Taliban's power increased, it had even less reason to engage in peace negotiations. To stem the Taliban's momentum on the ground this spring, the Biden administration would have had to not only abrogate the Trump withdrawal agreement but also deploy more troops and get them more deeply involved in the fighting. This would have breached Biden's campaign commitment to end the war in Afghanistan and ran against the strong bipartisan public support for withdrawal. The Taliban reads statements from American politicians and likely watches poll numbers. They could not have been surprised when, in April, Biden reaffirmed the American commitment to a complete withdrawal of troops, albeit on a somewhat slower timetable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 The Taliban knew it had won the war once Biden's predecessor had signed the troop withdrawal agreement - now it was only a matter of time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FISHHEAD Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 He certainly worst in my lifetime..................and if THE BILL gets passed, it's really going to be a DISASTER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 5 minutes ago, Smoke said: The fact that the United States entered into negotiations and then an agreement with the Taliban, without even inviting the Afghan government to the table, undercut the power and legitimacy of the government. The citizenry, including those in the national armed services and police, could plainly see that its own government was being ignored, a helpless bystander in critical discussions about the country's future. After we had cut the legs out from under this government and rendered it a paper tiger, it is no wonder that when those serving in the Afghan army and police were asked to fight, most said, "No, thanks." The agreement also did absolutely nothing to attempt to bring about a peaceful settlement of the war between the Afghan government and the Taliban. A genuine peace deal would have made our withdrawal contingent on the progress of peace negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban. But it did not. Trump agreed unconditionally to bring down U.S. troop levels to 8,600 by mid-July 2020 and totally withdraw by May 2021. The agreement anticipated there would be peace negotiations, but in August, Trump voluntarily cut troop levels down to 4,500, even more quickly than required by the agreement, even though negotiations had not even begun. This was a clear signal there would be no linkage between withdrawals and peace, contrary to what U.S. diplomats were telling the parties. This signal was received loud and clear by the Taliban. They balked at starting negotiations until December, and even then, had zero incentive to make any concessions since Trump had already announced that there would be only 2,500 troops in Afghanistan by the time he left office, the smallest U.S. force in 20 years. It was clear to the Taliban that the Americans were quickly headed for the exits. All Trumps fault huh? Gotcha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 President Donald Trump has long exulted in superlatives. The first. The best. The most. The greatest. “No president has ever done what I’ve done,” he boasts. “No president has ever even come close,” he says. But as his four years in office draw to an end, there’s only one title to which he can lay claim: Donald Trump is the worst president America has ever had. In December 2019, he became the third president to be impeached. Last week, Trump entered a category all his own, becoming the first president to be impeached twice. But impeachment, which depends in part on the makeup of Congress, is not the most objective standard. What does being the worst president actually mean? And is there even any value, at the bitter end of a bad presidency, in spending energy on judging a pageant of failed presidencies It is helpful to think of the responsibilities of a president in terms of the two elements of the oath of office set forth in the Constitution. In the first part, presidents swear to “faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States.” This is a pledge to properly perform the three jobs the presidency combines into one: head of state, head of government, and commander in chief. In the second part, they promise to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Trump was a serial violator of his oath—as evidenced by his continual use of his office for personal financial gain—but focusing on three crucial ways in which he betrayed it helps clarify his singular historical status. First, he failed to put the national-security interests of the United States ahead of his own political needs. Second, in the face of a devastating pandemic, he was grossly derelict, unable or unwilling to marshal the requisite resources to save lives while actively encouraging public behavior that spread the disease. And third, held to account by voters for his failures, he refused to concede defeat and instead instigated an insurrection, stirring a mob that stormed the Many chief executives have failed, in one way or another, to live up to the demands of the job, or to competently discharge them. But historians now tend to agree that our worst presidents are those who fall short in the second part of their pledge, in some way endangering the Constitution. And if you want to understand why these three failures make Trump the worst of all our presidents, the place to begin is in the basement of the presidential rankings, where dwell his rivals for that singular dishonor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Posted August 19, 2021 Report Share Posted August 19, 2021 Trump’s heartless and incompetent approach to immigration, his use of tax policy to punish states that didn’t vote for him, his diversion of public funds to properties owned by him and his family, his impulsive and self-defeating approach to trade, and his petulance toward traditional allies assured on their own that he would not be seen as a successful modern president. But those failures have more to do with the first part of his oath. The case that Trump is not just the worst of our modern presidents but the worst of them all rests on three other pillars, not all of which have a Nixonian parallel.Trump is the first president since America became a superpower to subordinate national-security interests to his political needs. Nixon’s mishandling of renewed peace negotiations with Hanoi in the 1972 election campaign led to the commission of a war crime, the unnecessary “Christmas bombing” at the end of that year. But it cannot compare, in terms of the harm to U.S. national interests, to Trump’s serial subservience to foreign strongmen such as Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey, Kim Jong Un of North Korea, and, of course, Russia’s Vladimir Putin—none of whom act out of a sense of shared interests with the United States. Trump’s effort to squeeze the Ukrainians to get dirt on his likely opponent in 2020, the cause of his first impeachment, was just the best-documented instance of a form of corruption that characterized his entire foreign policy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.