Timely Hitting Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Yes. Who gives a fuck about the exact same transgressions on the other side of the aisle? Typical partisan dumbfuckery.He's not holding that office today. What do you not understand? The past is the past. We should learn from it, not use it as an excuse and out for all future failures and mistakes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boatboatboat Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 50% of the country thinks unemployment went up and the stock market down during the last 8 years. Most people think crime is at all time highs (not lows).That is always frustrating to me I can point out many things that have gotten worse the last 8 years. But people seldom talk about them. They say "well hell, we have all these terror attacks all the time, the economy is horrible, no one has any money, there are no jobs, crime is way up" What do you say to that person? Was talking with a guy the other day at legion. Guns and shooting was the topic. over and Over and OVER all he wanted to discuss was the city of Chicago. Didn't want to discuss the other 99% of the countries population. He knew gun crimes and shootings were UP NATION WIDE............because he heard it was bad I chicago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 And I said I'm willing to do that, but it'll never change the fact that as a human being he's a complete pos. Every politician is a complete POS. The quicker you realize that, the better off you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Are you fking kidding me? The republicans threw an 8 year temper tantrum? Blocking legislation that they would normally be in favor of and that was good for the USA soley because Obama was for it. completely different. That is their job. You didn't see us out in the streets everyday whining and breaking shit. This is the generation of participation trophies. They don't know how to lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 He's not holding that office today. What do you not understand? The past is the past. We should learn from it, not use it as an excuse and out for all future failures and mistakes. An excuse? No. The protests just become complete and utter bullshit. There would have been no protests over HRC even though another alleged rapist would have resided in the White House and the sitting President would have played an active role in attempting to cover them up. That's what you fail to understand. Not me. I see the hypocrisy all over the place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Timely and the protesters are far more concerned about rape allegations than multiple corruption allegations against the other major party's candidate. Sad state of affairs in America. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 The "protests" feed trumps base, it's a good thing as far as I'm concerned, it's like the black lives matter nonsense, the more they defile america, destroy property,act like animals, the better it is for the republicans...and trump. It's one of the main reason he won. Remember Baltimore, Ferguson, Chicago. Remember the Mexicans waiving the Mexican flag and burning the American flag? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 completely different. That is their job. You didn't see us out in the streets everyday whining and breaking shit. This is the generation of participation trophies. They don't know how to lose.That's their job? To not show up for work and get nothing accomplished because they don't like the guy in office? To reject a perfectly sound and reasonable SCOTUS nominee, not because they don't agree with him (because they did for the most part) but because they don't like the guy who appointed him? I didn't realize it was their job to hold the country hostage for 8 years because they didn't like the President because he wasn't on their team. Blind partisanship is the biggest problem with the country currently; bipartisan issues are practically non-existent today. It's embarrassing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 That's their job? To not show up for work and get nothing accomplished because they don't like the guy in office? To reject a perfectly sound and reasonable SCOTUS nominee, not because they don't agree with him (because they did for the most part) but because they don't like the guy who appointed him? I didn't realize it was their job to hold the country hostage for 8 years because they didn't like the President because he wasn't on their team. Blind partisanship is the biggest problem with the country currently; bipartisan issues are practically non-existent today. It's embarrassing. Their job is to do what the people that elecected them tell then to do. They did a great job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 The left is embarrassing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Their job is to do what the people that elecected them tell then to do. They did a great job.Their approval rating, during the tenure of Obama, was at an all-time low. How is that what the people wanted them to do? Congress approval rating was 8% at one point, and 17% most recently. How can you possibly argue they did a great job or that most people approved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sol Aristatel Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 All of the protests are childish. Give the guy a chance to govern. Sore losers. No temper tantrums when Obama won.Yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sol Aristatel Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Every politician is a complete POS. The quicker you realize that, the better off you are.Yup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Their job is to do what the people elecected them to do. They did a great job.Never once did obama reach out across the aisle to compromise with the republicans, now the nutcases in the media are wondering if trump will reach out to the dems...ahh, no chance. Obama had both houses of congress his first two years and failed miserably, hopefully Trump wont miss this opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timely Hitting Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 http://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/hq0r3bbiu0iqnsqpblbw6g.png Unreal to claim people thought they were doing a good job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyF0cker Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Weren't you a Bernie supporter? Trump has already started the systemic destruction of everything someone like Bernie Sanders believes in. Look at the appointments. Yes. I was a Bernie supporter. I want crony capitalism out of Washington and he offered the best chance of that happening IMO. Trump has a better chance of doing that than HRC would have. HRC would have meant the status quo. Even if it gets worse under Trump. it will become more pronounced and change will eventually happen to reverse it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasson621 Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 The left is embarrassing Give them some space it is literally crumbling before them we have control of it all, then if we screw it up they can have it back in 4 years if we don't they have can get it in 20 years....maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boatboatboat Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Their approval rating, during the tenure of Obama, was at an all-time low. How is that what the people wanted them to do? Congress approval rating was 8% at one point, and 17% most recently. How can you possibly argue they did a great job or that most people approved?There was a great deal of anger and people wanted a change they got it Senate House Congress Years Total Dems Reps Others Vacant Total Dems Reps Others Vacant 34th 1855–1857 62 42 15 5 — 234 83 108 43 — 35th 1857–1859 64 39 20 5 — 237 131 92 14 — 36th 1859–1861 66 38 26 2 — 237 101 113 23 — 37th 1861–1863 50 11 31 7 1 178 42 106 28 2 38th 1863–1865 51 12 39 — — 183 80 103 — — 39th 1865–1867 52 10 42 — — 191 46 145 — — 40th 1867–1869 53 11 42 — — 193 49 143 — 1 41st 1869–1871 74 11 61 — 2 243 73 170 — — 42nd 1871–1873 74 17 57 — — 243 104 139 — — 43rd 1873–1875 74 19 54 — 1 293 88 203 — 2 44th 1875–1877 76 29 46 — 1 293 181 107 3 2 45th 1877–1879 76 36 39 1 — 293 156 137 — — 46th 1879–1881 76 43 33 — — 293 150 128 14 1 47th 1881–1883 76 37 37 2 — 293 130 152 11 — 48th 1883–1885 76 36 40 — — 325 200 119 6 — 49th 1885–1887 76 34 41 — 1 325 182 140 2 1 50th 1887–1889 76 37 39 — — 325 170 151 4 — 51st 1889–1891 84 37 47 — — 330 156 173 1 — 52nd 1891–1893 88 39 47 2 — 333 231 88 14 — 53rd 1893–1895 88 44 38 3 3 356 220 126 10 — 54th 1895–1897 88 39 44 5 — 357 104 246 7 — 55th 1897–1899 90 34 46 10 — 357 134 206 16 1 56th 1899–1901 90 26 53 11 — 357 163 185 9 — 57th 1901–1903 90 29 56 3 2 357 153 198 5 1 58th 1903–1905 90 32 58 — — 386 178 207 — 1 59th 1905–1907 90 32 58 — — 386 136 250 — — 60th 1907–1909 92 29 61 — 2 386 164 222 — — 61st 1909–1911 92 32 59 — 1 391 172 219 — — 62nd 1911–1913 92 42 49 — 1 391 228 162 1 — 63rd 1913–1915 96 51 44 1 — 435 290 127 18 — 64th 1915–1917 96 56 39 1 — 435 231 193 8 3 65th 1917–1919 96 53 42 1 — 435 2101 216 9 — 66th 1919–1921 96 47 48 1 — 435 191 237 7 — 67th 1921–1923 96 37 59 — — 435 132 300 1 2 68th 1923–1925 96 43 51 2 — 435 207 225 3 — 69th 1925–1927 96 40 54 1 1 435 183 247 5 — 70th 1927–1929 96 47 48 1 — 435 195 237 3 — 71st 1929–1931 96 39 56 1 — 435 163 267 1 4 72nd 1931–1933 96 47 48 1 — 435 2162 218 1 — 73rd 1933–1935 96 59 36 1 — 435 313 117 5 — 74th 1935–1937 96 69 25 2 — 435 322 103 10 — 75th 1937–1939 96 75 17 4 — 435 333 89 13 — 76th 1939–1941 96 69 23 4 — 435 262 169 4 — 77th 1941–1943 96 66 28 2 — 435 267 162 6 — 78th 1943–1945 96 57 38 1 — 435 222 209 4 — 79th 1945–1947 96 57 38 1 — 435 243 190 2 — 80th 1947–1949 96 45 51 — — 435 188 246 1 — 81st 1949–1951 96 54 42 — — 435 263 171 1 — 82nd 1951–1953 96 48 47 1 — 435 234 199 2 — 83rd 1953–1955 96 46 48 2 — 435 213 221 1 — 84th 1955–1957 96 48 47 1 — 435 232 203 — — 85th 1957–1959 96 49 47 — — 435 234 201 — — 86th 1959–1961 98 64 34 — — 4363 283 153 — — 87th 1961–1963 100 64 36 — — 4374 262 175 — — 88th 1963–1965 100 67 33 — — 435 258 176 — 1 89th 1965–1967 100 68 32 — — 435 295 140 — — 90th 1967–1969 100 64 36 — — 435 248 187 — — 91st 1969–1971 100 58 42 — — 435 243 192 — — 92nd 1971–1973 100 54 44 2 — 435 255 180 — — 93rd 1973–1975 100 56 42 2 — 435 242 192 1 — 94th 1975–1977 100 61 37 2 — 435 291 144 — — 95th 1977–1979 100 61 38 1 — 435 292 143 — — 96th 1979–1981 100 58 41 1 — 435 277 158 — — 97th 1981–1983 100 46 53 1 — 435 242 192 1 — 98th 1983–1985 100 46 54 — — 435 269 166 — — 99th 1985–1987 100 47 53 — — 435 253 182 — — 100th 1987–1989 100 55 45 — — 435 258 177 — — 101st 1989–1991 100 55 45 — — 435 260 175 — — 102nd 1991–1993 100 56 44 — — 435 267 167 1 — 103rd 1993–1995 100 57 43 — — 435 258 176 1 — 104th 1995–1997 100 48 52 — — 435 204 230 1 — 105th 1997–1999 100 45 55 — — 435 207 226 2 — 106th 1999–2001 100 45 55 — — 435 211 223 1 — 107th 2001–2003 100 50 50 — — 435 212 221 2 — 108th 2003–2005 100 48 51 1 — 435 205 229 1 — 109th 2005–2007 100 44 55 1 — 435 202 231 1 1 110th 2007–2009 100 49 49 2 — 435 233 198 — 4 111th 2009–2011 100 57 41 2 2 435 256 178 — 1 112th 2011–2013 100 51 47 2 — 435 193 242 — — 113th 2013–2015 100 54 45 1 — 435 201 234 — — 114th 2015–2017 100 44 54 2 — 435 188 246 — 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeman Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 In 2018 there are 25 dem senate seats up for re-election, only 8 republican, it's gonna be ugly for the poor democrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 I love how leftists always tell people how they should feel. Timely cares more about " grabbing the pussy" than women do. 53% of White Women voted for Trump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boatboatboat Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 In 2018 there are 25 dem senate seats up for re-election, only 8 republican, it's gonna be ugly for the poor democrats!Yikes I didn't know that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Remember when the left told Mexicans how the should feel? Trump got like 30% Lolololo Nobody is buying your shit anymore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cop Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 In 2018 there are 25 dem senate seats up for re-election, only 8 republican, it's gonna be ugly for the poor democrats! Yup. And I think most are in states that voted for Trump. It's a beautiful thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWarning Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Remember when the left told Mexicans how the should feel? Trump got like 30% Lolololo Nobody is buying your shit anymoreI thought just the racists voted for Trump? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRevolver Posted January 21, 2017 Report Share Posted January 21, 2017 Yes. Who gives a fuck about the exact same transgressions on the other side of the aisle? Typical partisan dumbfuckery. Just ignore those and focus on the ones that don't align with your politics. And people wonder why middle class Americans get fucked. -500 Balco read that and thought it was a new sub-group of the LGBT community. Bunch of dum-dums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.